These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36385254)
21. Genome-scale CRISPR screens are efficient in non-homologous end-joining deficient cells. Ferreira da Silva J; Salic S; Wiedner M; Datlinger P; Essletzbichler P; Hanzl A; Superti-Furga G; Bock C; Winter G; Loizou JI Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15751. PubMed ID: 31673055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cas9 in Human Embryos: On Target but No Repair. Hoffmann ER; Roig I Cell; 2020 Dec; 183(6):1464-1466. PubMed ID: 33306952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ionizing radiation and genetic risks. XVII. Formation mechanisms underlying naturally occurring DNA deletions in the human genome and their potential relevance for bridging the gap between induced DNA double-strand breaks and deletions in irradiated germ cells. Sankaranarayanan K; Taleei R; Rahmanian S; Nikjoo H Mutat Res; 2013; 753(2):114-130. PubMed ID: 23948232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Multi-pathway DNA-repair reporters reveal competition between end-joining, single-strand annealing and homologous recombination at Cas9-induced DNA double-strand breaks. van de Kooij B; Kruswick A; van Attikum H; Yaffe MB Nat Commun; 2022 Sep; 13(1):5295. PubMed ID: 36075911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Kinetics and Fidelity of the Repair of Cas9-Induced Double-Strand DNA Breaks. Brinkman EK; Chen T; de Haas M; Holland HA; Akhtar W; van Steensel B Mol Cell; 2018 Jun; 70(5):801-813.e6. PubMed ID: 29804829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Single-Strand Annealing Plays a Major Role in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair following CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage in Zhang WW; Matlashewski G mSphere; 2019 Aug; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31434745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Annealing of Complementary DNA Sequences During Double-Strand Break Repair in Holsclaw JK; Sekelsky J Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):467-480. PubMed ID: 28258182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative assessment of HR and NHEJ activities via CRISPR/Cas9-induced oligodeoxynucleotide-mediated DSB repair. Du J; Yin N; Xie T; Zheng Y; Xia N; Shang J; Chen F; Zhang H; Yu J; Liu F DNA Repair (Amst); 2018 Oct; 70():67-71. PubMed ID: 30212742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in approaches in zebrafish. Albadri S; Del Bene F; Revenu C Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():77-85. PubMed ID: 28300641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. CRISPR/Cas9 cleavages in budding yeast reveal templated insertions and strand-specific insertion/deletion profiles. Lemos BR; Kaplan AC; Bae JE; Ferrazzoli AE; Kuo J; Anand RP; Waterman DP; Haber JE Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(9):E2040-E2047. PubMed ID: 29440496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. CRISPR/Cas9-Induced Double-Strand Break Repair in Arabidopsis Nonhomologous End-Joining Mutants. Shen H; Strunks GD; Klemann BJ; Hooykaas PJ; de Pater S G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jan; 7(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 27866150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Precision genome editing in the CRISPR era. Salsman J; Dellaire G Biochem Cell Biol; 2017 Apr; 95(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 28177771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Different DNA repair pathways are involved in single-strand break-induced genomic changes in plants. Wolter F; Schindele P; Beying N; Scheben A; Puchta H Plant Cell; 2021 Nov; 33(11):3454-3469. PubMed ID: 34375428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Target residence of Cas9-sgRNA influences DNA double-strand break repair pathway choices in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Liu SC; Feng YL; Sun XN; Chen RD; Liu Q; Xiao JJ; Zhang JN; Huang ZC; Xiang JF; Chen GQ; Yang Y; Lou C; Li HD; Cai Z; Xu SM; Lin H; Xie AY Genome Biol; 2022 Aug; 23(1):165. PubMed ID: 35915475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CRISPR/Cas-based precision genome editing via microhomology-mediated end joining. Van Vu T; Thi Hai Doan D; Kim J; Sung YW; Thi Tran M; Song YJ; Das S; Kim JY Plant Biotechnol J; 2021 Feb; 19(2):230-239. PubMed ID: 33047464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Inhibition of nonhomologous end joining to increase the specificity of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Vartak SV; Raghavan SC FEBS J; 2015 Nov; 282(22):4289-94. PubMed ID: 26290158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]