BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36385574)

  • 1. Preliminary evaluation of two-row versus three-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis after rectal resection: a single-center retrospective analysis.
    Quero G; Fiorillo C; Menghi R; Rosa F; Massimiani G; Schena CA; De Sio D; Laterza V; Lucinato C; Papa V; Tondolo V; Alfieri S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2501-2510. PubMed ID: 36385574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
    Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
    Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection with Two Planned Stapler Fires.
    Otsuka K; Kimura T; Matsuo T; Fujii H; Yaegashi M; Sato K; Kondo S; Sasaki A
    JSLS; 2019; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 30914830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the circular compression stapler and circular mechanical stapler in the end-to-side transanal colorectal anastomosis after left colon and rectal resections A single center experience.
    Pironi D; Vendettuoli M; Pontone S; Panarese A; Arcieri S; Filippini A; Grimaldi G
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():23-30. PubMed ID: 27025236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate.
    Braunschmid T; Hartig N; Baumann L; Dauser B; Herbst F
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5318-5326. PubMed ID: 28634627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between circular stapler size and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Jiang Y; Chen H; Kong M; Sun D; Sheng H
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2022 Dec; 18(7):1931-1936. PubMed ID: 36647952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-row, three-row or powered circular stapler, which to choose when performing colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Martín-Arévalo J; Pla-Martí V; Huntley D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Izquierdo-Moreno A; Garzón-Hernández LP; Garcés-Albir M; Espí-Macías A; Moro-Valdezate D
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2024 Apr; 39(1):51. PubMed ID: 38607585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive approaches to the management of anastomotic leakage following restorative rectal cancer resection.
    Creavin B; Ryan ÉJ; Kelly ME; Moynihan A; Redmond CE; Ahern D; Kennelly R; Hanly A; Martin ST; O'Connell PR; Brophy DP; Winter DC
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Dec; 21(12):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 31254432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter?
    Reif de Paula T; Simon H; Shah M; Lee-Kong S; Kiely JM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Apr; 24(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 32036461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Redo coloanal anastomosis for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: an analysis of 59 cases.
    Westerduin E; Borstlap WAA; Musters GD; Westerterp M; van Geloven AAW; Tanis PJ; Wolthuis AM; Bemelman WA; D'Hoore A
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jan; 20(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28795776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of a robotic stapler on symptomatic anastomotic leakage in robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Chen K; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Hino H; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Kato S; Hanaoka M; Saito K; Maeda C; Kojima T; Shioi I; Nanishi K; Tanaka Y; Kasai S
    Surg Today; 2022 Jan; 52(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 34110488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: comparison of stapled versus compression anastomosis.
    Dauser B; Braunschmid T; Ghaffari S; Riss S; Stift A; Herbst F
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Oct; 398(7):957-64. PubMed ID: 23943311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Control Comparison of the New EndoWrist and Traditional Laparoscopic Staplers for Anterior Rectal Resection with the Da Vinci Xi: A Case Study.
    Guadagni S; Di Franco G; Gianardi D; Palmeri M; Ceccarelli C; Bianchini M; Furbetta N; Caprili G; D'Isidoro C; Moglia A; Melfi F; Buccianti P; Mosca F; Morelli L
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1422-1427. PubMed ID: 29920142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of staple height and rectal-wall thickness on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection.
    Naoi D; Horie H; Sadatomo A; Koinuma K; Ota G; Oshiro K; Tahara M; Mori K; Ito H; Inoue Y; Homma Y; Mimura T; Lefor AK; Sata N
    Asian J Surg; 2023 Apr; 46(4):1577-1582. PubMed ID: 36216667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.