These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36385574)

  • 1. Preliminary evaluation of two-row versus three-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis after rectal resection: a single-center retrospective analysis.
    Quero G; Fiorillo C; Menghi R; Rosa F; Massimiani G; Schena CA; De Sio D; Laterza V; Lucinato C; Papa V; Tondolo V; Alfieri S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2501-2510. PubMed ID: 36385574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
    Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
    Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection with Two Planned Stapler Fires.
    Otsuka K; Kimura T; Matsuo T; Fujii H; Yaegashi M; Sato K; Kondo S; Sasaki A
    JSLS; 2019; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 30914830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the circular compression stapler and circular mechanical stapler in the end-to-side transanal colorectal anastomosis after left colon and rectal resections A single center experience.
    Pironi D; Vendettuoli M; Pontone S; Panarese A; Arcieri S; Filippini A; Grimaldi G
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():23-30. PubMed ID: 27025236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate.
    Braunschmid T; Hartig N; Baumann L; Dauser B; Herbst F
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5318-5326. PubMed ID: 28634627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between circular stapler size and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Jiang Y; Chen H; Kong M; Sun D; Sheng H
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2022 Dec; 18(7):1931-1936. PubMed ID: 36647952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence of anastomotic leakage using powered circular staplers versus manual circular staplers for left colorectal anastomosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Barrachina-Martinez I; González-de-Julián S; Vivas-Consuelo D; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2024 Jul; 28(1):76. PubMed ID: 38954099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-row, three-row or powered circular stapler, which to choose when performing colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Martín-Arévalo J; Pla-Martí V; Huntley D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Izquierdo-Moreno A; Garzón-Hernández LP; Garcés-Albir M; Espí-Macías A; Moro-Valdezate D
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2024 Apr; 39(1):51. PubMed ID: 38607585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive approaches to the management of anastomotic leakage following restorative rectal cancer resection.
    Creavin B; Ryan ÉJ; Kelly ME; Moynihan A; Redmond CE; Ahern D; Kennelly R; Hanly A; Martin ST; O'Connell PR; Brophy DP; Winter DC
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Dec; 21(12):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 31254432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter?
    Reif de Paula T; Simon H; Shah M; Lee-Kong S; Kiely JM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Apr; 24(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 32036461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Redo coloanal anastomosis for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: an analysis of 59 cases.
    Westerduin E; Borstlap WAA; Musters GD; Westerterp M; van Geloven AAW; Tanis PJ; Wolthuis AM; Bemelman WA; D'Hoore A
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jan; 20(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28795776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of a robotic stapler on symptomatic anastomotic leakage in robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Chen K; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Hino H; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Kato S; Hanaoka M; Saito K; Maeda C; Kojima T; Shioi I; Nanishi K; Tanaka Y; Kasai S
    Surg Today; 2022 Jan; 52(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 34110488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: comparison of stapled versus compression anastomosis.
    Dauser B; Braunschmid T; Ghaffari S; Riss S; Stift A; Herbst F
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Oct; 398(7):957-64. PubMed ID: 23943311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Control Comparison of the New EndoWrist and Traditional Laparoscopic Staplers for Anterior Rectal Resection with the Da Vinci Xi: A Case Study.
    Guadagni S; Di Franco G; Gianardi D; Palmeri M; Ceccarelli C; Bianchini M; Furbetta N; Caprili G; D'Isidoro C; Moglia A; Melfi F; Buccianti P; Mosca F; Morelli L
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1422-1427. PubMed ID: 29920142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.