These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3638647)
1. Misconceptions in the wake of the Wendy Savage affair. Interview by Harriet Gaze. Newson K Nurs Times; 1986 Aug 6-12; 82(32):20-1. PubMed ID: 3638647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Obstetrician who blamed delay in a Caesarean section on a "stupid midwife" is struck off. Dyer C BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g6066. PubMed ID: 25294060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Childbirth on trial. Devlin R Nurs Times; 1986 Feb 26-Mar 4; 82(9):19-20. PubMed ID: 3634385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. War of independence. Interview by Anne Taylor. Lewis R; Stapleton H Nurs Times; 1995 Jan 25-31; 91(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 7862565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Opinion leaders in Europe and the United States. 5. Dr. Wendy Savage, a British obstetrician supporting active patients and midwives. Interview by J. Pearce]. Savage W Josanpu Zasshi; 1988 Sep; 42(9):738-41. PubMed ID: 3204733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sir William Power Memorial Lecture. "Are obstetrics & midwifery doomed"? Acheson D Midwives Chron; 1991 Jun; 104(1241):158-66. PubMed ID: 2072873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Wendy Savage affair. Craig CJ S Afr Med J; 1987 Feb; 71(3):136-7. PubMed ID: 3810357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. RCM Supplement. An enduring affair. Interview by Laurence Dopson. Jenkins R Nurs Times; 1988 Jul 20-26; 84(29):72. PubMed ID: 3405867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Midwifery care on trial? Arnold M Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse; 1986 Jun; 22(6):207-8. PubMed ID: 3637606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Are so man cesarean sections necessary? (interview by Dr. Thomas Meissner)]. Schneider KT MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 May; 148(20):17. PubMed ID: 16805184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of the legal system in the cesarean childbirth controversy. Miller J Nurs Law Ethics; 1980 Dec; 1(10):1-2, 6, 8. PubMed ID: 6905161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Savage case. Week one: the inquiry begins. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Feb; 292(6518):476. PubMed ID: 3081131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Relations between Alberta midwives, MDs appear to be thawing despite high-profile trial. Williams LS CMAJ; 1991 Sep; 145(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 1878832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends versus tradition in cesarean surgery: effects on midwifery practice and cesarean mothers' future pregnancies. Gaskin IM Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2007; (82):32-4. PubMed ID: 17725126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Profile: 'The minister's midwife'. Interview by Laurence Dopson. King A Nurs Times; 1984 Jul 18-24; 80(29):18-20. PubMed ID: 6566157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Medical liability in the delayed use of cesarean section]. Schlund GH Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1984 Sep; 44(9):591-2. PubMed ID: 6567562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Blind justice. Downe S Nurs Times; 1989 Feb 1-7; 85(5):24. PubMed ID: 2928185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Development & use of a recovery room for the delivery suite. Macdonald R; Lyons G; Taylor PA Midwives Chron; 1988 Oct; 101(1209):313-5. PubMed ID: 3205182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Delayed cesarean section in preeclampsia with placental abruption and fetal distress. Hamilton T; Schifrin BS J Perinatol; 1991 Jun; 11(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 1890480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]