201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36387274)
1. Molecular dynamics simulations of the adsorption of an intrinsically disordered protein: Force field and water model evaluation in comparison with experiments.
Koder Hamid M; Månsson LK; Meklesh V; Persson P; Skepö M
Front Mol Biosci; 2022; 9():958175. PubMed ID: 36387274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conformational Preferences of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain: A Case Study for Modern Force Fields.
Gopal SM; Wingbermühle S; Schnatwinkel J; Juber S; Herrmann C; Schäfer LV
J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 33382616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of the structural ensembles of p53 TAD2 by molecular dynamics simulations with different force fields.
Ouyang Y; Zhao L; Zhang Z
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 20(13):8676-8684. PubMed ID: 29537020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting molecular properties of α-synuclein using force fields for intrinsically disordered proteins.
Pedersen KB; Flores-Canales JC; Schiøtt B
Proteins; 2023 Jan; 91(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 35950933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrinsically disordered protein-specific force field CHARMM36IDPSFF.
Liu H; Song D; Lu H; Luo R; Chen HF
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2018 Oct; 92(4):1722-1735. PubMed ID: 29808548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physicochemical Characterisation of KEIF-The Intrinsically Disordered N-Terminal Region of Magnesium Transporter A.
Jephthah S; Månsson LK; Belić D; Morth JP; Skepö M
Biomolecules; 2020 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 32316569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of Charge-Augmented Three-Point Water Model (CAIPi3P) for Accurate Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
de Souza JV; Zariquiey FS; Bronowska AK
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 32859072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly.
Aliev AE; Courtier-Murias D
J Phys Chem B; 2010 Sep; 114(38):12358-75. PubMed ID: 20825228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Balanced Solvent Model for Intrinsically Disordered and Ordered Proteins.
Mu J; Pan Z; Chen HF
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Oct; 61(10):5141-5151. PubMed ID: 34546059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. General Purpose Water Model Can Improve Atomistic Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Shabane PS; Izadi S; Onufriev AV
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2620-2634. PubMed ID: 30865832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phosphorylation of a Disordered Peptide-Structural Effects and Force Field Inconsistencies.
Rieloff E; Skepö M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1924-1935. PubMed ID: 32050065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: On the Accuracy of the TIP4P-D Water Model and the Representativeness of Protein Disorder Models.
Henriques J; Skepö M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jul; 12(7):3407-15. PubMed ID: 27243806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Force-Field Induced Bias in the Structure of Aβ21-30: A Comparison of OPLS, AMBER, CHARMM, and GROMOS Force Fields.
Smith MD; Rao JS; Segelken E; Cruz L
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Dec; 55(12):2587-95. PubMed ID: 26629886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Coupled Two-Dimensional Main Chain Torsional Potential in Modeling Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Gao Y; Zhang C; Zhang JZ; Mei Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 28095698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How accurate are your simulations? Effects of confined aqueous volume and AMBER FF99SB and CHARMM22/CMAP force field parameters on structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins: Amyloid-β
Weber OC; Uversky VN
Intrinsically Disord Proteins; 2017; 5(1):e1377813. PubMed ID: 30250773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Force Field Effects in Simulations of Flexible Peptides with Varying Polyproline II Propensity.
Jephthah S; Pesce F; Lindorff-Larsen K; Skepö M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Oct; 17(10):6634-6646. PubMed ID: 34524800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Phosphorylated Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: A Force Field Comparison.
Rieloff E; Skepö M
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 34576338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of transferable forcefields for protein simulations attests improved description of disordered states and secondary structure propensities, and hints at multi-protein systems as the next challenge for optimization.
Abriata LA; Dal Peraro M
Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2021; 19():2626-2636. PubMed ID: 34025949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of Aβ Monomers through the Convergence of Ensemble Properties among Simulations with Multiple Force Fields.
Rosenman DJ; Wang C; García AE
J Phys Chem B; 2016 Jan; 120(2):259-77. PubMed ID: 26562747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
