These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36389263)

  • 1. Comparison of cell viability assessment and visualization of
    Shailaja A; Bruce TF; Gerard P; Powell RR; Pettigrew CA; Kerrigan JL
    Biofilm; 2022 Dec; 4():100090. PubMed ID: 36389263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Green fluorescent protein-propidium iodide (GFP-PI) based assay for flow cytometric measurement of bacterial viability.
    Lehtinen J; Nuutila J; Lilius EM
    Cytometry A; 2004 Aug; 60(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 15290717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of microscopic filamentous fungal biofilms - Choosing the suitable methodology.
    Kulišová M; Maťátková O; Brányik T; Zelenka J; Drábová L; Kolouchová IJ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2023 Feb; 205():106676. PubMed ID: 36693497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of new probes and stains for improved assessment of cell viability and extracellular polymeric substances in Candida albicans biofilms.
    Jin Y; Zhang T; Samaranayake YH; Fang HH; Yip HK; Samaranayake LP
    Mycopathologia; 2005 Apr; 159(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 15883718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Propidium iodide staining underestimates viability of adherent bacterial cells.
    Rosenberg M; Azevedo NF; Ivask A
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6483. PubMed ID: 31019274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide.
    Stiefel P; Schmidt-Emrich S; Maniura-Weber K; Ren Q
    BMC Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 15():36. PubMed ID: 25881030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aspergillus fumigatus biofilm on primary human sinonasal epithelial culture.
    Singhal D; Baker L; Wormald PJ; Tan L
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2011; 25(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 21819757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification, Viability Assessment, and Visualization Strategies for Acinetobacter Biofilms.
    Kim JS; Lim J
    J Vis Exp; 2023 Aug; (198):. PubMed ID: 37677005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and confocal laser scanning microscopic analysis.
    Takenaka S; Iwaku M; Hoshino E
    J Infect Chemother; 2001 Jun; 7(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 11455498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of S. epidermidis biofilms exposed to farnesol, vancomycin and rifampicin.
    Cerca N; Gomes F; Pereira S; Teixeira P; Oliveira R
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 May; 5():244. PubMed ID: 22591918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FISH and Calcofluor staining techniques to detect in situ filamentous fungal biofilms in water.
    Gonçalves AB; Santos IM; Paterson RR; Lima N
    Rev Iberoam Micol; 2006 Sep; 23(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 17196030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In Vitro Efficacy of Continuous Mild High Temperature on the Biofilm Formation of Aspergillus Niger.
    Zeng R; Tong JB; Liu YZ; Chen Q; Lin T; Li M; Lü GX
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2017 Dec; 39(6):762-767. PubMed ID: 29338819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural analysis of biofilms and pellets of Aspergillus niger by confocal laser scanning microscopy and cryo scanning electron microscopy.
    Villena GK; Fujikawa T; Tsuyumu S; Gutiérrez-Correa M
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Mar; 101(6):1920-6. PubMed ID: 19919894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-invasive method to quantify local bacterial concentrations in a mixed culture biofilm.
    Ma H; Bryers JD
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 37(10):1081-9. PubMed ID: 20552252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compatibility of the green fluorescent protein and a general nucleic acid stain for quantitative description of a Pseudomonas putida biofilm.
    Nancharaiah YV; Venugopalan VP; Wuertz S; Wilderer PA; Hausner M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Feb; 60(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 15590092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confusion over live/dead stainings for the detection of vital microorganisms in oral biofilms--which stain is suitable?
    Netuschil L; Auschill TM; Sculean A; Arweiler NB
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Jan; 14():2. PubMed ID: 24410850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biofilms on tracheoesophageal voice prostheses: a confocal laser scanning microscopy demonstration of mixed bacterial and yeast biofilms.
    Kania RE; Lamers GE; van de Laar N; Dijkhuizen M; Lagendijk E; Huy PT; Herman P; Hiemstra P; Grote JJ; Frijns J; Bloemberg GV
    Biofouling; 2010 Jul; 26(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 20473799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cytometric approach for a rapid evaluation of susceptibility of Candida strains to antifungals.
    Pina-Vaz C; Sansonetty F; Rodrigues AG; Costa-Oliveira S; Tavares C; Martinez-de-Oliveira J
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2001 Nov; 7(11):609-18. PubMed ID: 11737085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biofilms and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing.
    Simitsopoulou M; Chatzimoschou A; Roilides E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1356():183-97. PubMed ID: 26519074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A high-throughput microfluidic dental plaque biofilm system to visualize and quantify the effect of antimicrobials.
    Nance WC; Dowd SE; Samarian D; Chludzinski J; Delli J; Battista J; Rickard AH
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2013 Nov; 68(11):2550-60. PubMed ID: 23800904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.