188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36389263)
1. Comparison of cell viability assessment and visualization of
Shailaja A; Bruce TF; Gerard P; Powell RR; Pettigrew CA; Kerrigan JL
Biofilm; 2022 Dec; 4():100090. PubMed ID: 36389263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Green fluorescent protein-propidium iodide (GFP-PI) based assay for flow cytometric measurement of bacterial viability.
Lehtinen J; Nuutila J; Lilius EM
Cytometry A; 2004 Aug; 60(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 15290717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of microscopic filamentous fungal biofilms - Choosing the suitable methodology.
Kulišová M; Maťátková O; Brányik T; Zelenka J; Drábová L; Kolouchová IJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2023 Feb; 205():106676. PubMed ID: 36693497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of new probes and stains for improved assessment of cell viability and extracellular polymeric substances in Candida albicans biofilms.
Jin Y; Zhang T; Samaranayake YH; Fang HH; Yip HK; Samaranayake LP
Mycopathologia; 2005 Apr; 159(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 15883718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Propidium iodide staining underestimates viability of adherent bacterial cells.
Rosenberg M; Azevedo NF; Ivask A
Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6483. PubMed ID: 31019274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide.
Stiefel P; Schmidt-Emrich S; Maniura-Weber K; Ren Q
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 15():36. PubMed ID: 25881030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aspergillus fumigatus biofilm on primary human sinonasal epithelial culture.
Singhal D; Baker L; Wormald PJ; Tan L
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2011; 25(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 21819757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification, Viability Assessment, and Visualization Strategies for Acinetobacter Biofilms.
Kim JS; Lim J
J Vis Exp; 2023 Aug; (198):. PubMed ID: 37677005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and confocal laser scanning microscopic analysis.
Takenaka S; Iwaku M; Hoshino E
J Infect Chemother; 2001 Jun; 7(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 11455498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of S. epidermidis biofilms exposed to farnesol, vancomycin and rifampicin.
Cerca N; Gomes F; Pereira S; Teixeira P; Oliveira R
BMC Res Notes; 2012 May; 5():244. PubMed ID: 22591918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FISH and Calcofluor staining techniques to detect in situ filamentous fungal biofilms in water.
Gonçalves AB; Santos IM; Paterson RR; Lima N
Rev Iberoam Micol; 2006 Sep; 23(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 17196030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In Vitro Efficacy of Continuous Mild High Temperature on the Biofilm Formation of Aspergillus Niger.
Zeng R; Tong JB; Liu YZ; Chen Q; Lin T; Li M; Lü GX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2017 Dec; 39(6):762-767. PubMed ID: 29338819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structural analysis of biofilms and pellets of Aspergillus niger by confocal laser scanning microscopy and cryo scanning electron microscopy.
Villena GK; Fujikawa T; Tsuyumu S; Gutiérrez-Correa M
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Mar; 101(6):1920-6. PubMed ID: 19919894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-invasive method to quantify local bacterial concentrations in a mixed culture biofilm.
Ma H; Bryers JD
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 37(10):1081-9. PubMed ID: 20552252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compatibility of the green fluorescent protein and a general nucleic acid stain for quantitative description of a Pseudomonas putida biofilm.
Nancharaiah YV; Venugopalan VP; Wuertz S; Wilderer PA; Hausner M
J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Feb; 60(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 15590092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confusion over live/dead stainings for the detection of vital microorganisms in oral biofilms--which stain is suitable?
Netuschil L; Auschill TM; Sculean A; Arweiler NB
BMC Oral Health; 2014 Jan; 14():2. PubMed ID: 24410850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biofilms on tracheoesophageal voice prostheses: a confocal laser scanning microscopy demonstration of mixed bacterial and yeast biofilms.
Kania RE; Lamers GE; van de Laar N; Dijkhuizen M; Lagendijk E; Huy PT; Herman P; Hiemstra P; Grote JJ; Frijns J; Bloemberg GV
Biofouling; 2010 Jul; 26(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 20473799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytometric approach for a rapid evaluation of susceptibility of Candida strains to antifungals.
Pina-Vaz C; Sansonetty F; Rodrigues AG; Costa-Oliveira S; Tavares C; Martinez-de-Oliveira J
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2001 Nov; 7(11):609-18. PubMed ID: 11737085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biofilms and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing.
Simitsopoulou M; Chatzimoschou A; Roilides E
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1356():183-97. PubMed ID: 26519074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A high-throughput microfluidic dental plaque biofilm system to visualize and quantify the effect of antimicrobials.
Nance WC; Dowd SE; Samarian D; Chludzinski J; Delli J; Battista J; Rickard AH
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2013 Nov; 68(11):2550-60. PubMed ID: 23800904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
