These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36389464)

  • 1. Interactions between acoustic challenges and processing depth in speech perception as measured by task-evoked pupil response.
    Shen J; Fitzgerald LP; Kulick ER
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():959638. PubMed ID: 36389464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of linguistic context and noise type on speech comprehension.
    Fitzgerald LP; DeDe G; Shen J
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1345619. PubMed ID: 38375107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Speech Intelligibility, Noise Reduction Processing, and Working Memory Capacity on the Pupil Dilation Response.
    Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):392-404. PubMed ID: 34898265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological discrimination and contrast detection in pupillometry.
    Chiossi JSC; Patou F; Ng EHN; Faulkner KF; Lyxell B
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1232262. PubMed ID: 38023001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
    Koelewijn T; van Haastrecht JAP; Kramer SE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.
    Wendt D; Hietkamp RK; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 28640038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pupil Dilation Reflects Perceptual Priorities During a Receptive Speech Task.
    Mechtenberg H; Giorio C; Myers EB
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):425-440. PubMed ID: 37882091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupillary response to dynamic pitch alteration during speech perception in noise.
    Shen J
    JASA Express Lett; 2021 Nov; 1(11):115202. PubMed ID: 34778875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.
    Stanley N; Davis T; Estis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28277212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.
    Micula A; Rönnberg J; Fiedler L; Wendt D; Jørgensen MC; Larsen DK; Ng EHN
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1668-1679. PubMed ID: 33859121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition in noise task among children and young-adults: a pupillometry study.
    Trau-Margalit A; Fostick L; Harel-Arbeli T; Nissanholtz-Gannot R; Taitelbaum-Swead R
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1188485. PubMed ID: 37425148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.