These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36389466)

  • 21. Explainable AI as evidence of fair decisions.
    Leben D
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1069426. PubMed ID: 36865358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias.
    Ghai B; Mueller K
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Jan; 29(1):473-482. PubMed ID: 36155458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conceptualizations of fairness and legitimacy in the context of Ethiopian health priority setting: Reflections on the applicability of accountability for reasonableness.
    Petricca K; Bekele A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 28544136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improvement of RTT Fairness Problem in BBR Congestion Control Algorithm by Gamma Correction.
    Pan W; Li X; Tan H; Xu J; Li X
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 34208544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. FairRankVis: A Visual Analytics Framework for Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Graph Mining Models.
    Xie T; Ma Y; Kang J; Tong H; Maciejewski R
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Jan; 28(1):368-377. PubMed ID: 34587074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Facing the Challenges of Developing Fair Risk Scoring Models.
    Szepannek G; Lübke K
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():681915. PubMed ID: 34723172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robots are judging me: Perceived fairness of algorithmic recruitment tools.
    Hilliard A; Guenole N; Leutner F
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():940456. PubMed ID: 35959005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Big Data, Small Personas: How Algorithms Shape the Demographic Representation of Data-Driven User Segments.
    Salminen J; Chhirang K; Jung SG; Thirumuruganathan S; Guan KW; Jansen BJ
    Big Data; 2022 Aug; 10(4):313-336. PubMed ID: 35969694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Making.
    Ahn Y; Lin YR
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2020 Jan; 26(1):1086-1095. PubMed ID: 31425083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A joint fairness model with applications to risk predictions for underrepresented populations.
    Do H; Nandi S; Putzel P; Smyth P; Zhong J
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):826-840. PubMed ID: 35142367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Utilizing data sampling techniques on algorithmic fairness for customer churn prediction with data imbalance problems.
    Maw M; Haw SC; Ho CK
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():988. PubMed ID: 36071889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Research agenda for algorithmic fairness studies: Access to justice lessons for interdisciplinary research.
    Kontiainen L; Koulu R; Sankari S
    Front Artif Intell; 2022; 5():882134. PubMed ID: 36620752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. United States v. Lyons: toward a new conception of legal insanity.
    Mossman D
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 3365479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated?
    Barysė D; Sarel R
    Artif Intell Law (Dordr); 2023 Jan; ():1-30. PubMed ID: 36643574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The Constitutional Court and new scenarios of biomedicine. (Constitutional reflections on the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal 116/1999, June 17)].
    Arruego Rodríguez G; Chueca Rodríguez R
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2000; (12):91-111. PubMed ID: 11147218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating Intellectual Disability after the
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 31533993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A nontechnical explanation of the counterfactual definition of confounding.
    Bours MJL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():91-100. PubMed ID: 32068101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Third-Party Punishment or Compensation? It Depends on the Reputational Benefits.
    Li Z; Hu G; Xu L; Li Q
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():676064. PubMed ID: 34149569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.