164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36394023)
1. Comparison of early osseointegration of non-thermal atmospheric plasma-functionalized/ SLActive titanium implant surfaces in beagle dogs.
Long L; Zhang M; Gan S; Zheng Z; He Y; Xu J; Fu R; Guo Q; Yu D; Chen W
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():965248. PubMed ID: 36394023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
Lee JT; Cho SA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osseointegration of SLActive implants in diabetic pigs.
Schlegel KA; Prechtl C; Möst T; Seidl C; Lutz R; von Wilmowsky C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 22111960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel Nonthermal Atmospheric Plasma Irradiation of Titanium Implants Promotes Osteogenic Effect in Osteoporotic Conditions.
Liao Y; Xu J; Zheng Z; Fu R; Zhang X; Gan S; Yang S; Hou C; Xu HHK; Chen W
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2024 May; 10(5):3255-3267. PubMed ID: 38684056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Excessive occlusal load on chemically modified and moderately rough titanium implants restored with cantilever reconstructions. An experimental study in dogs.
Lima LA; Bosshardt DD; Chambrone L; Araújo MG; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1142-1154. PubMed ID: 31529643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal Bone Loss Around Early-Loaded SLA and SLActive Implants: Radiological Follow-Up Evaluation Up to 6.5 Years.
Şener-Yamaner ID; Yamaner G; Sertgöz A; Çanakçi CF; Özcan M
Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):592-599. PubMed ID: 28731897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones.
El Chaar E; Zhang L; Zhou Y; Sandgren R; Fricain JC; Dard M; Pippenger B; Catros S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):443–450. PubMed ID: 30703182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequential healing events of osseointegration at UnicCa(®) and SLActive(®) implant surfaces: an experimental study in the dog.
Favero R; Lang NP; Salata LA; Martins Neto EC; Caroprese M; Botticelli D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 25818234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of novel non-thermal atmospheric plasma treatment of titanium on physical and biological improvements and in vivo osseointegration in rats.
Zheng Z; Ao X; Xie P; Wu J; Dong Y; Yu D; Wang J; Zhu Z; Xu HHK; Chen W
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10637. PubMed ID: 32606349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of early osseointegration of SLA
Alayan J; Vaquette C; Saifzadeh S; Hutmacher D; Ivanovski S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1325-1333. PubMed ID: 27683194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of a Novel Surface of Bioactive Implants on Osseointegration: A Comparative and Histomorfometric Correlation and Implant Stability Study in Minipigs.
Romero-Ruiz MM; Gil-Mur FJ; Ríos-Santos JV; Lázaro-Calvo P; Ríos-Carrasco B; Herrero-Climent M
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 May; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 31075984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Performance of Titanium-Zirconium Implants in the Elderly: A Biomechanical Comparative Study in the Minipig.
Wen B; Chen J; Dard M; Cai Z
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 18(6):1200-1209. PubMed ID: 26834004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pro-osteogenic properties of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium surfaces: Crosstalk between signalling pathways in in vivo models.
Calciolari E; Hamlet S; Ivanovski S; Donos N
J Periodontal Res; 2018 Aug; 53(4):598-609. PubMed ID: 29687451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized clinical study of the peri-implant healing to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in patients receiving anticoagulants.
Marković A; Đinić A; Calvo Guirado JL; Tahmaseb A; Šćepanović M; Janjić B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1241-1247. PubMed ID: 27539149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: implant stability and microcomputed tomographic analysis.
Al-Hamdan SH; Al-Hamdan K; Junker R; Jansen JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 22299082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative in vivo study of strontium-functionalized and SLActive™ implant surfaces in early bone healing.
Offermanns V; Andersen OZ; Sillassen M; Almtoft KP; Andersen IH; Kloss F; Foss M
Int J Nanomedicine; 2018; 13():2189-2197. PubMed ID: 29692613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone morphology changes around two types of bone-level implants installed in fresh extraction sockets--a histomorphometric study in Beagle dogs.
Alharbi HM; Babay N; Alzoman H; Basudan S; Anil S; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1106-12. PubMed ID: 24690000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of dental implants with sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) and modified (SLActive) surfaces during the osseointegration period.
Sayin Ozel G; Inan O; Secilmis Acar A; Alniacik Iyidogan G; Dolanmaz D; Yildirim G
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2021; 15(4):226-231. PubMed ID: 35070174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Endo-sinus bone formation after transalveolar sinus floor elevation without grafting with simultaneous implant placement: Histological and histomorphometric assessment in a dog model.
Qian SJ; Mo JJ; Shi JY; Gu YX; Si MS; Lai HC
J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Sep; 45(9):1118-1127. PubMed ID: 29953634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
