167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36394842)
41. Clinical Comparison of High-resolution and Standard Refractions and Prescriptions.
Meyer D; Rickert M; Reed O; Joret P; Kollbaum P
Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Nov; 100(11):751-760. PubMed ID: 37861987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison between wavefront-derived refraction and auto-refraction.
Yakar K; Kan E; Duran M
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Dec; 44():103712. PubMed ID: 37459941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of six different autorefractor designs on the precision and accuracy of refractive error measurement.
Venkataraman AP; Brautaset R; Domínguez-Vicent A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0278269. PubMed ID: 36441778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy of wavefront aberrometer refraction vs manifest refraction in cataract patients: impact of age, ametropia and visual function.
Huelle JO; Katz T; Draeger J; Pahlitzsch M; Druchkiv V; Steinberg J; Richard G; Linke SJ
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 251(4):1163-73. PubMed ID: 23292274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of refractive error measurements by three different models of autorefractors and subjective refraction in young adults.
Wosik J; Patrzykont M; Pniewski J
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):B1-B6. PubMed ID: 31044948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluation of the SVOne: A Handheld, Smartphone-Based Autorefractor.
Ciuffreda KJ; Rosenfield M
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1133-9. PubMed ID: 26540478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults.
Farook M; Venkatramani J; Gazzard G; Cheng A; Tan D; Saw SM
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1066-70. PubMed ID: 16357649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The Pentacam® AXL Wave provides a reliable wavefront-based objective refraction when compared to manifest subjective refraction: A prospective study.
Balparda K; Acevedo-Urrego A; Silva-Quintero LA; Herrera-Chalarca T
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 70(5):1533-1537. PubMed ID: 35502018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Beyond traditional subjective refraction.
Rodriguez-Lopez V; Dorronsoro C
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 33(3):228-234. PubMed ID: 35102097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Accuracy of WASCA Aberrometer Refraction Compared to Manifest Refraction and Cycloplegic Refraction in Hyperopia Measurement.
Fu D; Ding X; Shang J; Yu Z; Zhou X
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 9(11):5. PubMed ID: 33101782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluating Self-Refraction and Ready-Made Spectacles for Treatment of Uncorrected Refractive Error.
Camp AS; Shane TS; Kang J; Thomas B; Pole C; Lee RK
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2018; 25(5-6):392-398. PubMed ID: 30118609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Accuracy of Noncycloplegic Refraction for Detecting Refractive Errors in School-aged African Children.
Ilechie AA; Addo NA; Abraham CH; Owusu-Ansah A; Annan-Prah A
Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Aug; 98(8):920-928. PubMed ID: 34460453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors.
Gwiazda J; Weber C
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 14747762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Repeatability and reproducibility of manifest refraction.
Taneri S; Arba-Mosquera S; Rost A; Kießler S; Dick HB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Dec; 46(12):1659-1666. PubMed ID: 33259390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Instant vision assessment device for measuring refraction in low vision.
Cheng D; Woo GC
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Sep; 104(7):780-787. PubMed ID: 33689633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of Refractive Measures of Three Autorefractors in Children and Adolescents.
Xiong S; Lv M; Zou H; Zhu J; Lu L; Zhang B; Deng J; Yao C; He X; Xu X
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):894-902. PubMed ID: 28816868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Hand-Held Nidek versus Table-Mounted Huvitz Autorefractors and Their Agreement with Subjective Refraction in Adults.
Sayed KM; Alsmman AH; Mostafa EM
Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():1391-1401. PubMed ID: 33833497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Use of the HARK autorefractor in children.
Isenberg SJ; Del Signore M; Madani-Becker G
Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 131(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 11292405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Steps towards Smarter Solutions in Optometry and Ophthalmology-Inter-Device Agreement of Subjective Methods to Assess the Refractive Errors of the Eye.
Ohlendorf A; Leube A; Wahl S
Healthcare (Basel); 2016 Jul; 4(3):. PubMed ID: 27417629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
