163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36394842)
61. Accuracy of noncycloplegic refraction performed at school screening camps.
Khurana R; Tibrewal S; Ganesh S; Tarkar R; Nguyen PTT; Siddiqui Z; Dasgupta S
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 66(6):806-811. PubMed ID: 29785988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.
Wisse RPL; Muijzer MB; Cassano F; Godefrooij DA; Prevoo YFDM; Soeters N
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Nov; 21(11):e14808. PubMed ID: 31702560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
Bennett JR; Stalboerger GM; Hodge DO; Schornack MM
J Optom; 2015; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Assessment of multifocal contact lens over-refraction using an infrared, open-field autorefractor: A preliminary study.
Giner A; Aldaba M; Arjona M; Vilaseca M; Pujol J
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 25907202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Clinical evaluation of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in Chinese school-aged children: a cross-sectional study.
Guo R; Shi L; Xu K; Hong D
Transl Pediatr; 2022 Jun; 11(6):933-946. PubMed ID: 35800271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. [Relationships between refractive parameters: sphere, cylinder and axis].
Touzeau O; Gaujoux T; Bullet J; Allouch C; Borderie V; Laroche L
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2012 Oct; 35(8):587-98. PubMed ID: 22673049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children.
Li T; Zhou X; Zhu J; Tang X; Gu X
Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 30136309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Accuracy of an automated refractor using a Hartmann-Shack sensor after corneal refractive surgery and cataract surgery.
Park JH; Kim MJ; Park JH; Song IS; Kim JY; Tchah H
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1889-97. PubMed ID: 26603398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Peripheral refraction and spherical aberration profiles with single vision, bifocal and multifocal soft contact lenses.
Fedtke C; Ehrmann K; Bakaraju RC
J Optom; 2020; 13(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 30772211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Comparison between refraction measured by Spot Vision Screening™ and subjective clinical refractometry.
de Jesus DL; Villela FF; Orlandin LF; Eiji FN; Dantas DO; Alves MR
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2016 Feb; 71(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 26934234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Wavefront analyzers induce instrument myopia.
Cervino A; Hosking SL; Rai GK; Naroo SA; Gilmartin B
J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):795-803. PubMed ID: 17061717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Comparing School-Aged Refraction Measurements Using the 2WIN-S Portable Refractor in Relation to Cycloplegic Retinoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Liu Z; Pazo EE; Ye H; Yu C; Xu L; He W
J Ophthalmol; 2021; 2021():6612476. PubMed ID: 34094595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data.
Hernández CS; Gil A; Casares I; Poderoso J; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Sánchez-Montañés M; Lage E
J Optom; 2022; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S22-S31. PubMed ID: 35431181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Repeatability and validity of Zywave aberrometer measurements.
Hament WJ; Nabar VA; Nuijts RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Dec; 28(12):2135-41. PubMed ID: 12498848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and OPD-scan III with the subjective refraction.
Zhu R; Long KL; Wu XM; Li QD
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2016 Jul; 20(14):2988-92. PubMed ID: 27460724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Reproducibility of manifest refraction between surgeons and optometrists in a clinical refractive surgery practice.
Reinstein DZ; Yap TE; Carp GI; Archer TJ; Gobbe M;
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):450-9. PubMed ID: 24581774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction.
Rosenfield M; Chiu NN
Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Accuracy, speed and repeatability of the voice assisted subjective refractor (VASR).
Kabat AG; Lievens CW; Newman CM; Weber J
Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():1807-1813. PubMed ID: 31571819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
