These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36395053)

  • 1. Habituation to onsets is controlled by spatially selective distractor expectation.
    Turatto M; Valsecchi M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 36395053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Habituation to abrupt-onset distractors with different spatial occurrence probability.
    Valsecchi M; Turatto M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):649-666. PubMed ID: 35851440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Habituation to visual onsets is affected by local and global distractors rate.
    De Tommaso M; Turatto M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Nov; 85(8):2531-2537. PubMed ID: 36977908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ignoring visual distractors: Habituation to onsets is driven by time-based expectation.
    Turatto M; De Tommaso M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Jun; 30(3):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 36284071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Habituation (of attentional capture) is not what you think it is.
    Turatto M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 37339053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Filtering visual onsets via habituation: A context-specific long-term memory of irrelevant stimuli.
    Turatto M; Bonetti F; Pascucci D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1028-1034. PubMed ID: 28547537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Habituation of oculomotor capture by sudden onsets: Stimulus specificity, spontaneous recovery and dishabituation.
    Bonetti F; Turatto M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):264-284. PubMed ID: 30570321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning to suppress likely distractor locations in visual search is driven by the local distractor frequency.
    Allenmark F; Zhang B; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1250-1278. PubMed ID: 36107665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does it help to expect distraction? Attentional capture is attenuated by high distractor frequency but not by trial-to-trial predictability.
    Bogaerts L; van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Mar; 48(3):246-261. PubMed ID: 35130015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term and long-term plasticity in the visual-attention system: Evidence from habituation of attentional capture.
    Turatto M; Pascucci D
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Apr; 130():159-69. PubMed ID: 26927305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reward expectation enhances reactive control of distraction by emotionally negative stimuli.
    Rong Y; Li Y; Müller HJ; Wei P
    Emotion; 2023 Aug; 23(5):1349-1359. PubMed ID: 36095173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition and habituation: preserved mechanisms of attentional selection in aging and Alzheimer's disease.
    Langley LK; Overmier JB; Knopman DS; Prod'Homme MM
    Neuropsychology; 1998 Jul; 12(3):353-66. PubMed ID: 9673993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):500-512. PubMed ID: 30816785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learned spatial suppression is not always proactive.
    Chang S; Dube B; Golomb JD; Leber AB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1031-1041. PubMed ID: 37199949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.
    Giesen C; Frings C; Rothermund K
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Strategic control over extent and timing of distractor-based response activation": Correction to Jost et al. (2017).
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):564. PubMed ID: 28368156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of distractor relevance on the strength and timing of cognitive control: Evidence from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Koob V; Janczyk M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1588-1614. PubMed ID: 37561515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulation of saccadic inhibition by distractor size and location.
    Buonocore A; McIntosh RD
    Vision Res; 2012 Sep; 69():32-41. PubMed ID: 22842403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.