155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36395512)
1. Differential Effects of Binaural Pitch Fusion Range on the Benefits of Voice Gender Differences in a "Cocktail Party" Environment for Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
Oh Y; Srinivasan NK; Hartling CL; Gallun FJ; Reiss LAJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):318-329. PubMed ID: 36395512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Binaural Pitch Fusion: Binaural Pitch Averaging in Cochlear Implant Users With Broad Binaural Fusion.
Oh Y; Reiss LAJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1450-1460. PubMed ID: 33136622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors underlying masking release by voice-gender differences and spatial separation cues in multi-talker listening environments in listeners with and without hearing loss.
Oh Y; Hartling CL; Srinivasan NK; Diedesch AC; Gallun FJ; Reiss LAJ
Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1059639. PubMed ID: 36507363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Binaural Pitch Fusion in Children With Normal Hearing, Hearing Aids, and Cochlear Implants.
Hartling CL; Fowler JR; Stark GN; Glickman B; Eddolls M; Oh Y; Ramsey K; Reiss LAJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1545-1559. PubMed ID: 33136630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
Liu YW; Tao DD; Chen B; Cheng X; Shu Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binaural summation, binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit in bimodal and bilateral adult cochlear implant users.
de Graaff F; Eikelboom RH; Sucher C; Kramer SE; Smits C
Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Sep; 22(5):245-256. PubMed ID: 33832408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
Reiss LAJ; Fowler JR; Hartling CL; Oh Y
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):390-397. PubMed ID: 28945657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
Cullington HE; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two Ears Are Not Always Better than One: Mandatory Vowel Fusion Across Spectrally Mismatched Ears in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Reiss LA; Eggleston JL; Walker EP; Oh Y
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 17(4):341-56. PubMed ID: 27220769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Ching TY; Incerti P; Hill M
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 14770014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
Ma N; Morris S; Kitterick PT
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.
Chang YP; Chang RY; Lin CY; Luo X
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 26752089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial Release From Informational and Energetic Masking in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
D'Onofrio K; Richards V; Gifford R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Nov; 63(11):3816-3833. PubMed ID: 33049147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):110-123. PubMed ID: 28787316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
