130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36395686)
1. Can advanced edge enhancement software improve image quality to visualise tubes, catheters and wires in digital chest radiographs?
Kristensen SV; Outzen C; Grau LM; Larsen TR; Bidstrup M; Egeskjold MV; Knude JA; Juhl D; Precht H
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jan; 29(1):165-170. PubMed ID: 36395686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of a novel edge enhancement software on image quality of DR hand images of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Outzen CB; Maron D; Nissen J; Munk J; Grau LM; Juhl D; Precht H
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):877-882. PubMed ID: 33676836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.
Precht H; Tingberg A; Waaler D; Outzen CB
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Feb; 27(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24221693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Observer performance in the localization of tubes and catheters on digital chest images: the role of expertise and image enhancement.
Nodine CF; Liu H; Miller WT; Kundel HL
Acad Radiol; 1996 Oct; 3(10):834-41. PubMed ID: 8923902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does software optimization influence the radiologists' perception in low dose paediatric pelvic examinations?
Precht H; Waaler D; Outzen CB; Brock Thorsen JB; Steen T; Hellfritzsch MB; Aagesen H; Holst AK; Le P; Lindequist S; Rasmussen L; Tingberg A
Radiography (Lond); 2019 May; 25(2):143-147. PubMed ID: 30955687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.
Smet MH; Breysem L; Mussen E; Bosmans H; Marshall NW; Cockmartin L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 29460076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the image quality and dose reduction in digital radiography with an advanced spatial noise reduction algorithm in pediatric patients.
Oh S; Kim JH; Yoo SY; Jeon TY; Kim YJ
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):8937-8946. PubMed ID: 34041570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Edge enhancement algorithm for low-dose X-ray fluoroscopic imaging.
Lee MS; Park CH; Kang MG
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Dec; 152():45-52. PubMed ID: 29054260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine images: a comparison between FFE and VGA.
Tingberg A; Båth M; Håkansson M; Medin J; Besjakov J; Sandborg M; Alm-Carlsson G; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):53-61. PubMed ID: 15933081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Virtual Grid Processed Clinical Chest Radiographs.
Gossye T; Buytaert D; Smeets PV; Morbée L; De Wilde C; Vermeiren K; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2022 Sep; 57(9):585-591. PubMed ID: 35438670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software.
Precht H; Gerke O; Rosendahl K; Tingberg A; Waaler D
Pediatr Radiol; 2012 Sep; 42(9):1112-8. PubMed ID: 22526280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical utility of postprocessed low-dose radiographs in skeletal imaging.
Kolck J; Ziegeler K; Walter-Rittel T; Hermann KGA; Hamm B; Beck A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20210881. PubMed ID: 34919419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method to incorporate the effect of beam quality on image noise in a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) based computer simulation for optimisation of digital radiography.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7379-7393. PubMed ID: 28742062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancement of chest radiographs obtained in the intensive care unit through bone suppression and consistent processing.
Chen S; Zhong S; Yao L; Shang Y; Suzuki K
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(6):2283-301. PubMed ID: 26930386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of bone suppression software in chest radiographs for improving image quality and reducing radiation dose.
Hong GS; Do KH; Son AY; Jo KW; Kim KP; Yun J; Lee CW
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5160-5171. PubMed ID: 33439320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced visualization of mobile chest X-ray images in the intensive care setting using software scatter correction.
Targett H; Hutchinson D; Hartley R; McWilliam R; Lopez B; Crone B; Bonner S
Acta Radiol; 2023 Feb; 64(2):563-571. PubMed ID: 35291841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of off-line image processing for optimization in chest computed radiography using a low cost system.
Muhogora WE; Msaki P; Padovani R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):4774. PubMed ID: 26103165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
