449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36397723)
1. Reporting and risk of bias of prediction models based on machine learning methods in preterm birth: A systematic review.
Yang Q; Fan X; Cao X; Hao W; Lu J; Wei J; Tian J; Yin M; Ge L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jan; 102(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 36397723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.
Dhiman P; Ma J; Andaur Navarro CL; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JAA; Hooft L; Kirtley S; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 35395724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence.
Collins GS; Dhiman P; Andaur Navarro CL; Ma J; Hooft L; Reitsma JB; Logullo P; Beam AL; Peng L; Van Calster B; van Smeden M; Riley RD; Moons KG
BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e048008. PubMed ID: 34244270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques.
Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAAG; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KG; Hooft L
BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e038832. PubMed ID: 33177137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review.
Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
BMJ; 2021 Oct; 375():n2281. PubMed ID: 34670780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review.
Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 35026997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved.
Dhiman P; Ma J; Navarro CA; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JA; Kirtley S; Hooft L; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():60-72. PubMed ID: 34214626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation.
Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; Abdulrahim B; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 31960915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current state and completeness of reporting clinical prediction models using machine learning in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review.
Munguía-Realpozo P; Etchegaray-Morales I; Mendoza-Pinto C; Méndez-Martínez S; Osorio-Peña ÁD; Ayón-Aguilar J; García-Carrasco M
Autoimmun Rev; 2023 May; 22(5):103294. PubMed ID: 36791873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of radiomics for predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.
Yuan E; Chen Y; Song B
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3467-3477. PubMed ID: 36749371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning models for diabetes management in acute care using electronic medical records: A systematic review.
Kamel Rahimi A; Canfell OJ; Chan W; Sly B; Pole JD; Sullivan C; Shrapnel S
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Apr; 162():104758. PubMed ID: 35398812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive Models for Estimating the Probability of Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review.
Black N; Henderson I; Al Wattar BH; Quenby S
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 140(5):821-841. PubMed ID: 36201785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic review of prediction models for spontaneous preterm birth in singleton asymptomatic pregnant women with risk factors.
Yan C; Yang Q; Li R; Yang A; Fu Y; Wang J; Li Y; Cheng Q; Hu S
Heliyon; 2023 Sep; 9(9):e20099. PubMed ID: 37809403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multivariable prediction models for health care spending using machine learning: a protocol of a systematic review.
Huang AW; Haslberger M; Coulibaly N; Galárraga O; Oganisian A; Belbasis L; Panagiotou OA
Diagn Progn Res; 2022 Mar; 6(1):4. PubMed ID: 35321760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies.
Nagendran M; Chen Y; Lovejoy CA; Gordon AC; Komorowski M; Harvey H; Topol EJ; Ioannidis JPA; Collins GS; Maruthappu M
BMJ; 2020 Mar; 368():m689. PubMed ID: 32213531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine learning prediction models in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review in transparent reporting.
Groot OQ; Ogink PT; Lans A; Twining PK; Kapoor ND; DiGiovanni W; Bindels BJJ; Bongers MER; Oosterhoff JHF; Karhade AV; Oner FC; Verlaan JJ; Schwab JH
J Orthop Res; 2022 Feb; 40(2):475-483. PubMed ID: 33734466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonlinear Machine Learning in Warfarin Dose Prediction: Insights from Contemporary Modelling Studies.
Zhang F; Liu Y; Ma W; Zhao S; Chen J; Gu Z
J Pers Med; 2022 Apr; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35629140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review of machine-learning models in orthopaedic trauma.
Dijkstra H; van de Kuit A; de Groot T; Canta O; Groot OQ; Oosterhoff JH; Doornberg JN; ; ; van den Bekerom M; Calderon SL; Colaris J; Duis KT; Esfahani SA; DiGiovanni C; Gordon M; Guss D; IJpma F; Jaarsma R; Janssen M; Jayakumar P; Kerkhoffs GM; Leighton R; van Munster B; Poolman R; Ring D; Schemtisch E; Stirler V; Tornetta P; Wijffels M
Bone Jt Open; 2024 Jan; 5(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 38226447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine Learning in Differentiating Gliomas from Primary CNS Lymphomas: A Systematic Review, Reporting Quality, and Risk of Bias Assessment.
Cassinelli Petersen GI; Shatalov J; Verma T; Brim WR; Subramanian H; Brackett A; Bahar RC; Merkaj S; Zeevi T; Staib LH; Cui J; Omuro A; Bronen RA; Malhotra A; Aboian MS
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2022 Apr; 43(4):526-533. PubMed ID: 35361577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
