171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36399217)
1. Reliability of stroke volume or pulse pressure variation as dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.
Chen J; Zhao S; Zhu Q
J Clin Monit Comput; 2023 Apr; 37(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 36399217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery.
Piccioni F; Bernasconi F; Tramontano GTA; Langer M
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 27306799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression.
Messina A; Caporale M; Calabrò L; Lionetti G; Bono D; Matronola GM; Brunati A; Frassanito L; Morenghi E; Antonelli M; Chew MS; Cecconi M
Crit Care; 2023 Nov; 27(1):431. PubMed ID: 37940953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation.
Jun JH; Chung RK; Baik HJ; Chung MH; Hyeon JS; Lee YG; Park SH
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):142. PubMed ID: 31390982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.
Zlicar M; Novak-Jankovic V; Blagus R; Cecconi M
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):825-832. PubMed ID: 29149433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study.
Vos JJ; Poterman M; Salm PP; Van Amsterdam K; Struys MM; Scheeren TW; Kalmar AF
Can J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 62(11):1153-60. PubMed ID: 26335905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stroke Volume and Arterial Pressure Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Elevated Stroke Volume Variation Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery: A Prospective Intervention Study.
Fischer A; Menger J; Mouhieddine M; Seidel M; Edlinger-Stanger M; Bevilacqua M; Brugger J; Hiesmayr M; Dworschak M
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2023 Mar; 37(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 36529634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.
Kim KM; Kim GS; Han M
Singapore Med J; 2022 Dec; 63(12):731-739. PubMed ID: 34911180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, and pleth variability index in predicting fluid responsiveness during different positive end expiratory pressure in prone position.
Chen Y; Fu Q; Mi WD
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Apr; 37(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 25936706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using dynamic preload indices in patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery with pneumoperitoneum in the Trendelenburg position.
Chin JH; Lee EH; Hwang GS; Choi WJ
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2013 Jul; 41(4):515-22. PubMed ID: 23808512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with thoracic kyphosis.
Chen Y; Guo X; Fu J; Dong T; Liu X; Lv H
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jul; 10(7):7571-7578. PubMed ID: 34154341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation in predicting fluid responsiveness undergoing one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang C; Feng Z; Cai J; Duan M; Li H; Dai Z; Lv H; Xu Z; Wang H; Chen Y
Ann Transl Med; 2023 Jan; 11(1):19. PubMed ID: 36760241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic preload markers to predict fluid responsiveness during and after major gastrointestinal surgery: an observational substudy of the OPTIMISE trial.
MacDonald N; Ahmad T; Mohr O; Kirk-Bayley J; Moppett I; Hinds CJ; Pearse RM
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Apr; 114(4):598-604. PubMed ID: 25500941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery.
Høiseth LØ; Hoff IE; Myre K; Landsverk SA; Kirkebøen KA
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Jul; 56(6):777-86. PubMed ID: 22288953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.
Renner J; Gruenewald M; Quaden R; Hanss R; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):650-8. PubMed ID: 19114894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stroke volume variation and dynamic arterial elastance predict fluid responsiveness even in thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a prospective observational study.
Hikasa Y; Suzuki S; Tanabe S; Noma K; Shirakawa Y; Fujiwara T; Morimatsu H
J Anesth; 2023 Dec; 37(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 37731141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
Kim KM; Gwak MS; Choi SJ; Kim MH; Park MH; Heo BY
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2013 Sep; 65(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 24101958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
