225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36399487)
1. Kinematic analysis of impairments and compensatory motor behavior during prosthetic grasping in below-elbow amputees.
Touillet A; Gouzien A; Badin M; Herbe P; Martinet N; Jarrassé N; Roby-Brami A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277917. PubMed ID: 36399487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can We Achieve Intuitive Prosthetic Elbow Control Based on Healthy Upper Limb Motor Strategies?
Merad M; de Montalivet É; Touillet A; Martinet N; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
Front Neurorobot; 2018; 12():1. PubMed ID: 29456499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis.
Michaelsen SM; Jacobs S; Roby-Brami A; Levin MF
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 157(2):162-73. PubMed ID: 14985899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks.
Touillet A; Billon-Grumillier C; Pierret J; Herbe P; Martinet N; Loiret I; Paysant J
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0272855. PubMed ID: 36730223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phantom-Mobility-Based Prosthesis Control in Transhumeral Amputees Without Surgical Reinnervation: A Preliminary Study.
Jarrassé N; de Montalivet E; Richer F; Nicol C; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; de Graaf JB
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2018; 6():164. PubMed ID: 30555823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shoulder kinematics plus contextual target information enable control of multiple distal joints of a simulated prosthetic arm and hand.
Mick S; Segas E; Dure L; Halgand C; Benois-Pineau J; Loeb GE; Cattaert D; de Rugy A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 33407618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Restoring natural upper limb movement through a wrist prosthetic module for partial hand amputees.
Choi S; Cho W; Kim K
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Oct; 20(1):135. PubMed ID: 37798778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transfemoral amputee recovery strategies following trips to their sound and prosthesis sides throughout swing phase.
Shirota C; Simon AM; Kuiken TA
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Sep; 12():79. PubMed ID: 26353775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multisession, noninvasive closed-loop neuroprosthetic control of grasping by upper limb amputees.
Agashe HA; Paek AY; Contreras-Vidal JL
Prog Brain Res; 2016; 228():107-28. PubMed ID: 27590967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of upper limb kinematics in two activities of daily living with different handling requirements.
Mesquita IA; Fonseca PFPD; Borgonovo-Santos M; Ribeiro E; Pinheiro ARV; Correia MV; Silva C
Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Aug; 72():102632. PubMed ID: 32452388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Upper-Limb Electromyogram Classification of Reaching-to-Grasping Tasks Based on Convolutional Neural Networks for Control of a Prosthetic Hand.
Kim KT; Park S; Lim TH; Lee SJ
Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():733359. PubMed ID: 34712114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Upper limb kinematics after cervical spinal cord injury: a review.
Mateo S; Roby-Brami A; Reilly KT; Rossetti Y; Collet C; Rode G
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 12():9. PubMed ID: 25637224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Myoelectric prosthesis users and non-disabled individuals wearing a simulated prosthesis exhibit similar compensatory movement strategies.
Williams HE; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Vette AH; Hebert JS
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 33933105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regressing grasping using force myography: an exploratory study.
Sadeghi Chegani R; Menon C
Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Oct; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 30352593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of compensatory movements between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users during activities of daily living.
Engdahl SM; Lee C; Gates DH
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Jul; 97():105713. PubMed ID: 35809535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wrist speed feedback improves elbow compensation and reaching accuracy for myoelectric transradial prosthesis users in hybrid virtual reaching task.
Earley EJ; Johnson RE; Sensinger JW; Hargrove LJ
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Jan; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 36658605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees.
Guémann M; Halgand C; Bastier A; Lansade C; Borrini L; Lapeyre É; Cattaert D; de Rugy A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 35690860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Movement Component Analysis of Reaching Strategies in Individuals With Stroke: Preliminary Study.
Ota H; Mukaino M; Inoue Y; Matsuura S; Yagi S; Kanada Y; Saitoh E; Otaka Y
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Dec; 10():e50571. PubMed ID: 38051570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses.
Clemente F; D'Alonzo M; Controzzi M; Edin BB; Cipriani C
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 26584497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
