These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36399989)
61. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V). de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels. Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Spanish language. Delgado Hernández J; León Gómez NM; Jiménez A; Izquierdo LM; Barsties V Latoszek B Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 May; 127(5):317-326. PubMed ID: 29490478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Do Standard Instrumental Acoustic, Perceptual, and Subjective Voice Outcomes Indicate Therapy Success in Patients With Functional Dysphonia? Reetz S; Bohlender JE; Brockmann-Bauser M J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):317-324. PubMed ID: 29395329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia. Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Its Isolated Acoustic Measures to Discriminate the Severity of Voice Disorders. Englert M; Lopes L; Vieira V; Behlau M J Voice; 2022 Jul; 36(4):582.e1-582.e10. PubMed ID: 32873433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Meta-Analysis on the Validity of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index. Batthyany C; Latoszek BBV; Maryn Y J Voice; 2022 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 35752532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores. Awan SN; Roy N; Zhang D; Cohen SM J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 26361215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. [Internal Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index version 03.01 und Acoustic Breathiness Index]. Latoszek BBV; Lehnert B Laryngorhinootologie; 2018 Sep; 97(9):630-635. PubMed ID: 29635679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Resonant Voice: Perceptual and Acoustic Analysis After an Intensive Lessac Kinesensic Training Workshop. Grama M; Barrichelo-Lindström V; Englert M; Kinghorn D; Behlau M J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):541.e1-541.e12. PubMed ID: 34785115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Deep learning in automatic detection of dysphonia: Comparing acoustic features and developing a generalizable framework. Chen Z; Zhu P; Qiu W; Guo J; Li Y Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Mar; 58(2):279-294. PubMed ID: 36117378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Objective Analysis Of Voice Quality In Patients With Thyroid Pathology. León Gómez NM; Delgado Hernández J; Luis Hernández J; Artazkoz Del Toro JJ Clin Otolaryngol; 2022 Jan; 47(1):81-87. PubMed ID: 34516048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children. Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Severity of voice disorders: integration of perceptual and acoustic data in dysphonic patients. Lopes LW; Cavalcante DP; Costa PO Codas; 2014; 26(5):382-8. PubMed ID: 25388071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders. Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; de Souza GS; Hachiya A; Tsuji DH J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e7-765.e11. PubMed ID: 26627119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Glottal function index questionnaire for screening of pediatric dysphonia. Pribuisiene R; Pribuisis K; Liutkevicius V; Balsevicius T; Milasiene R; Uloza V Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 123():97-101. PubMed ID: 31085464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed - CPPS and Acoustic Voice Quality Index - AVQI in healthy and altered children's voices: comparation, relationship with auditory-perceptual judgment and cut-off points. Rabelo ECDS; Dassie-Leite AP; Ribeiro VV; Madazio G; Behlau MS Codas; 2024; 36(4):e20230047. PubMed ID: 38808777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Acoustic and Perceptual Analyses of Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia in Mandarin-speaking Chinese. Chen Z; Li J; Ren Q; Ge P J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):333-339. PubMed ID: 29449062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Does the Accuracy of Medical Diagnoses Affect Novice Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Dysphonia Severity? Sauder C; Eadie T J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 30195410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A Comparative Study on Acoustic Voice Quality Index Between the Subjects with Spasmodic Dysphonia and Normophonia. Bhatt SS; Kabra S; Chatterjee I Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Dec; 74(Suppl 3):4927-4932. PubMed ID: 36742688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]