These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36402578)

  • 1. Improvements in image quality after optimization in digital intraoral radiographs.
    Barrineau AB; Mah P; Mallya SM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2023 Jan; 154(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 36402578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system.
    Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Feb; 12(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8631285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The importance of the ANSI ADA Standard for digital intraoral radiographic systems-a pragmatic approach to quality assurance.
    Mah P; Buchanan A; Reeves TE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Jan; 135(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 36117096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film.
    Cederberg RA; Tidwell E; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 9540092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms.
    Li G; Sanderink GC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Näsström K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15140815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of differences in pixel size on image characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic systems: a physical and visual evaluation.
    Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Okamura K; Shiotsuki K; Shibayama Y; Tsuru H; Akamine H; Tatsumi M; Kato T; Morishita J; Yoshiura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190378. PubMed ID: 32302229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of radiographic measurements obtained with conventional and indirect digital imaging during endodontic treatment.
    Schmitd LB; Lima Tde C; Chinellato LE; Bramante CM; Garcia RB; de Moraes IG; Bernardineli N
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 19089211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of digitally scanned radiographs with conventional film for the detection of small endodontic instruments.
    Fuge KN; Stuck AM; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 1998 Mar; 31(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9868939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX.
    Orosco FA; Bernardineli N; Garcia RB; Bramante CM; Duarte MA; Moraes IG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 23138737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility.
    Shi XQ; Benchimol D; Näsström K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130249. PubMed ID: 24170798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance phantom for digital dental imaging.
    Mah P; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):632-9. PubMed ID: 21862364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars.
    Topaloglu-Ak A; Aykut Yetkiner A; Güniz Baksi B; Eronat C
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26147823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the incorporation of a lead foil to intraoral digital receptors on the image quality and root fracture diagnosis.
    Farias Gomes A; Nejaim Y; Fontenele RC; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Sep; 48(6):20180369. PubMed ID: 30982341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Micro-Computed Tomography and Digital Intraoral Radiography to Determine the Accuracy of Digital Radiographic Measurements of Mandibular Molar Teeth in Dogs.
    Marron L; Rawlinson J; McGilvray K; Prytherch B
    J Vet Dent; 2017 Dec; 34(4):248-258. PubMed ID: 28974160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.