BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36402825)

  • 21. External Validation and Optimization of the SPRING Model for Prediction of Survival After Surgical Treatment of Bone Metastases of the Extremities.
    Sørensen MS; Gerds TA; Hindsø K; Petersen MM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 476(8):1591-1599. PubMed ID: 30020148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and comparison of 1-year survival models in patients with primary bone sarcomas: External validation of a Bayesian belief network model and creation and external validation of a new gradient boosting machine model.
    Holm CE; Grazal CF; Raedkjaer M; Baad-Hansen T; Nandra R; Grimer R; Forsberg JA; Petersen MM; Skovlund Soerensen M
    SAGE Open Med; 2022; 10():20503121221076387. PubMed ID: 35154743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting overall survival after curative resection of colon cancer.
    Wang S; Liu Y; Shi Y; Guan J; Liu M; Wang W
    J Int Med Res; 2021 May; 49(5):3000605211015023. PubMed ID: 33990147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development and Assessment of a Clinical Calculator for Estimating the Likelihood of Recurrence and Survival Among Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, and Surgery.
    Weiser MR; Chou JF; Keshinro A; Chapman WC; Bauer PS; Mutch MG; Parikh PJ; Cercek A; Saltz LB; Gollub MJ; Romesser PB; Crane CH; Shia J; Markowitz AJ; Garcia-Aguilar J; Gönen M;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2133457. PubMed ID: 34748003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prognostic models for locally advanced cervical cancer: external validation of the published models.
    Lora D; Gómez de la Cámara A; Fernández SP; Enríquez de Salamanca R; Gómez JFPR
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 28(5):e58. PubMed ID: 28657220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and external validation of two nomograms to predict overall survival and occurrence of distant metastases in adults after surgical resection of localised soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a retrospective analysis.
    Callegaro D; Miceli R; Bonvalot S; Ferguson P; Strauss DC; Levy A; Griffin A; Hayes AJ; Stacchiotti S; Pechoux CL; Smith MJ; Fiore M; Dei Tos AP; Smith HG; Mariani L; Wunder JS; Pollock RE; Casali PG; Gronchi A
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 May; 17(5):671-80. PubMed ID: 27068860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of the Living Kidney Donor Profile Index in the Canadian Kidney Transplant Recipient Population: A Validation Study.
    Shantier M; Li Y; Ashwin M; Famure O; Singh SK
    Can J Kidney Health Dis; 2020; 7():2054358120906976. PubMed ID: 32128225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Survival outcome and prognostic factors for colorectal cancer with synchronous bone metastasis: a population-based study.
    Li X; Hu W; Sun H; Gou H
    Clin Exp Metastasis; 2021 Feb; 38(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 33420873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development and Validation of a Novel Survival Prediction Model in Patients With Spinal Metastasis From Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
    Yang M; Xu W; Liu T; Yang X; Wang P; Wu S; Wei H; Zhao J; Yang C; Xiao J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Feb; 44(4):246-257. PubMed ID: 30059487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. External validation of the Leibovich prognosis score for nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma at a single European center applying routine pathology.
    Pichler M; Hutterer GC; Chromecki TF; Jesche J; Kampel-Kettner K; Rehak P; Pummer K; Zigeuner R
    J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1773-7. PubMed ID: 21944989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nontumor related risk score: A new tool to improve prediction of prognosis after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.
    Sasaki K; Margonis GA; Moro A; Wang J; Wagner D; Gagnière J; Shin JK; D'Silva M; Sahara K; Miyata T; Kusakabe J; Beyer K; Dupré A; Kamphues C; Imai K; Baba H; Endo I; Taura K; Cho JY; Aucejo F; Kornprat P; Kreis ME; Kim JM; Burkhart R; David Kwon CH; Pawlik TM
    Surgery; 2022 Jun; 171(6):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 35221105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and validation of a novel scoring system to predict the risk of uterine perforation during intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
    M Parvath ES; John NO; Sathyamurthy A; Ramireddy JK; Ram TS
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 May; 35(3):e35. PubMed ID: 38178701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Age and survival of cervical cancer patients with bone metastasis.
    Nartthanarung A; Thanapprapasr K; Udomsubpayakul U; Thanapprapasr D
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(19):8401-4. PubMed ID: 25339036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distant metastasis in patients with cervical cancer after primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and image guided adaptive brachytherapy.
    Schmid MP; Franckena M; Kirchheiner K; Sturdza A; Georg P; Dörr W; Pötter R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 24517875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Calculating the overall survival probability in patients with cervical cancer: a nomogram and decision curve analysis-based study.
    Xie G; Wang R; Shang L; Qi C; Yang L; Huang L; Yang W; Chung MC
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):833. PubMed ID: 32873257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study.
    Chen X; Duan H; Liu P; Lin L; Ni Y; Li D; Dai E; Zhan X; Li P; Huo Z; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):121. PubMed ID: 35282114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development and Validation of a New Prognostic System for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Farinati F; Vitale A; Spolverato G; Pawlik TM; Huo TL; Lee YH; Frigo AC; Giacomin A; Giannini EG; Ciccarese F; Piscaglia F; Rapaccini GL; Di Marco M; Caturelli E; Zoli M; Borzio F; Cabibbo G; Felder M; Sacco R; Morisco F; Biasini E; Foschi FG; Gasbarrini A; Svegliati Baroni G; Virdone R; Masotto A; Trevisani F; Cillo U;
    PLoS Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):e1002006. PubMed ID: 27116206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance of prediction models for nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and external validation study.
    Slieker RC; van der Heijden AAWA; Siddiqui MK; Langendoen-Gort M; Nijpels G; Herings R; Feenstra TL; Moons KGM; Bell S; Elders PJ; 't Hart LM; Beulens JWJ
    BMJ; 2021 Sep; 374():n2134. PubMed ID: 34583929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can a Nomogram Help to Predict the Overall and Cancer-specific Survival of Patients With Chondrosarcoma?
    Song K; Shi X; Wang H; Zou F; Lu F; Ma X; Xia X; Jiang J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 May; 476(5):987-996. PubMed ID: 29470233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic prediction and prognostic analysis of patients with cervical cancer: a landmarking analysis approach.
    Yang Z; Hou Y; Lyu J; Liu D; Chen Z
    Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 44():45-51. PubMed ID: 32220511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.