These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36403509)

  • 1. Personalized persuasion: Quantifying susceptibility to information exploitation in spear-phishing attacks.
    Xu T; Singh K; Rajivan P
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Apr; 108():103908. PubMed ID: 36403509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Susceptibility to Spear-Phishing Emails: Effects of Internet User Demographics and Email Content.
    Lin T; Capecci DE; Ellis DM; Rocha HA; Dommaraju S; Oliveira DS; Ebner NC
    ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact; 2019 Sep; 26(5):. PubMed ID: 32508486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal Detection Theory (SDT) Is Effective for Modeling User Behavior Toward Phishing and Spear-Phishing Attacks.
    Martin J; Dubé C; Coovert MD
    Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 60(8):1179-1191. PubMed ID: 30063406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Email phishing and signal detection: How persuasion principles and personality influence response patterns and accuracy.
    Lawson P; Pearson CJ; Crowson A; Mayhorn CB
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jul; 86():103084. PubMed ID: 32174448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creative Persuasion: A Study on Adversarial Behaviors and Strategies in Phishing Attacks.
    Rajivan P; Gonzalez C
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():135. PubMed ID: 29515478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who Gets Caught in the Web of Lies?: Understanding Susceptibility to Phishing Emails, Fake News Headlines, and Scam Text Messages.
    Sarno DM; Black J
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; 66(6):1742-1753. PubMed ID: 37127397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying Phishing Susceptibility for Detection and Behavior Decisions.
    Canfield CI; Fischhoff B; Davis A
    Hum Factors; 2016 Dec; 58(8):1158-1172. PubMed ID: 27562565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phishing in healthcare organisations: threats, mitigation and approaches.
    Priestman W; Anstis T; Sebire IG; Sridharan S; Sebire NJ
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2019 Sep; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 31488498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Employee Susceptibility to Phishing Attacks at US Health Care Institutions.
    Gordon WJ; Wright A; Aiyagari R; Corbo L; Glynn RJ; Kadakia J; Kufahl J; Mazzone C; Noga J; Parkulo M; Sanford B; Scheib P; Landman AB
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190393. PubMed ID: 30848810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Persuasive Appeals Predict Credibility Judgments of Phishing Messages.
    Baryshevtsev M; McGlynn J
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2020 May; 23(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 32271628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Good Are We at Detecting a Phishing Attack? Investigating the Evolving Phishing Attack Email and Why It Continues to Successfully Deceive Society.
    Carroll F; Adejobi JA; Montasari R
    SN Comput Sci; 2022; 3(2):170. PubMed ID: 35224514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting User Susceptibility to Phishing Based on Multidimensional Features.
    Yang R; Zheng K; Wu B; Li D; Wang Z; Wang X
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():7058972. PubMed ID: 35082844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. So Many Phish, So Little Time: Exploring Email Task Factors and Phishing Susceptibility.
    Sarno DM; Neider MB
    Hum Factors; 2022 Dec; 64(8):1379-1403. PubMed ID: 33835881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Role of Health Concerns in Phishing Susceptibility: Survey Design Study.
    Abdelhamid M
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 May; 22(5):e18394. PubMed ID: 32364511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Human Factors on Cyber Security within Healthcare Organisations: A Systematic Review.
    Nifakos S; Chandramouli K; Nikolaou CK; Papachristou P; Koch S; Panaousis E; Bonacina S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of and user preferences for security awareness training methodologies.
    Tschakert KF; Ngamsuriyaroj S
    Heliyon; 2019 Jun; 5(6):e02010. PubMed ID: 31338464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comprehensive survey of AI-enabled phishing attacks detection techniques.
    Basit A; Zafar M; Liu X; Javed AR; Jalil Z; Kifayat K
    Telecommun Syst; 2021; 76(1):139-154. PubMed ID: 33110340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethics and Phishing Experiments.
    Resnik DB; Finn PR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1241-1252. PubMed ID: 28812222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying and Mitigating Phishing Attack Threats in IoT Use Cases Using a Threat Modelling Approach.
    Abbas SG; Vaccari I; Hussain F; Zahid S; Fayyaz UU; Shah GA; Bakhshi T; Cambiaso E
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 34300556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting Priorities in Behavioral Interventions: An Application to Reducing Phishing Risk.
    Canfield CI; Fischhoff B
    Risk Anal; 2018 Apr; 38(4):826-838. PubMed ID: 29023908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.