159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36404329)
1. BMI and pelvimetry help to predict the duration of laparoscopic resection for low and middle rectal cancer.
Teng W; Liu J; Chen M; Zang W; Wu A
BMC Surg; 2022 Nov; 22(1):402. PubMed ID: 36404329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contraindication.
Ogiso S; Yamaguchi T; Hata H; Fukuda M; Ikai I; Yamato T; Sakai Y
Surg Endosc; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1907-12. PubMed ID: 21136101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mesorectal fat area as a useful predictor of the difficulty of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Yamaoka Y; Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Furutani A; Manabe S; Torii K; Koido K; Mori K
Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):557-566. PubMed ID: 30006838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer.
Akiyoshi T; Kuroyanagi H; Oya M; Konishi T; Fukuda M; Fujimoto Y; Ueno M; Miyata S; Yamaguchi T
Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 19715805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pelvic dimensions on preoperative imaging can identify poor-quality resections after laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid- and low rectal cancer.
Chau J; Solomon J; Liberman AS; Charlebois P; Stein B; Lee L
Surg Endosc; 2020 Oct; 34(10):4609-4615. PubMed ID: 31620910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI pelvimetry-based evaluation of surgical difficulty in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for male rectal cancer.
Chen J; Sun Y; Chi P; Sun B
Surg Today; 2021 Jul; 51(7):1144-1151. PubMed ID: 33420827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review.
Hong JS; Brown KGM; Waller J; Young CJ; Solomon MJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 32623536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of surgical difficulty in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer by use of MRI pelvimetry.
Yamamoto T; Kawada K; Kiyasu Y; Itatani Y; Mizuno R; Hida K; Sakai Y
BJS Open; 2020 Aug; 4(4):666-677. PubMed ID: 32342670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision].
Yan HH; Lou Z; Sheng J; Zhang W; Fu CG; Meng RG
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):846-50. PubMed ID: 22116717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of pelvimetry on anastomotic leakage in a consecutive series of open, laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resections with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Bertani E; Chiappa A; Della Vigna P; Radice D; Papis D; Cossu L; Biffi R; Bianchi PP; Luca F; Andreoni B
Hepatogastroenterology; 2014 Sep; 61(134):1574-81. PubMed ID: 25436345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Risk factor analysis on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy and establishment of a nomogram prediction model].
Jiang W; Feng MY; Dong XY; Dong SM; Zheng JX; Liu XM; Liu WJ; Yan J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):748-754. PubMed ID: 31422613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvic inlet shape measured by three-dimensional pelvimetry is a predictor of the operative time in the anterior resection of rectal cancer.
Shimada T; Tsuruta M; Hasegawa H; Okabayashi K; Ishida T; Asada Y; Suzumura H; Kitagawa Y
Surg Today; 2018 Jan; 48(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 28597348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Construction of a nomogram model to predict technical difficulty in performing laparoscopic sphincter-preserving radical resection for rectal cancer.
Zhou XC; Guan SW; Ke FY; Dhamija G; Wang Q; Chen BF
World J Gastroenterol; 2024 May; 30(18):2418-2439. PubMed ID: 38764764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection].
Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Predictive value of MRI pelvic measurements for "difficult pelvis" during total mesorectal excision].
Sun Z; Hou WY; Liu JJ; Xue HD; Xu PR; Wu B; Lin GL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 25(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 36562232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of transabdominal total mesorectal excision difficulty according to the angle of pelvic floor muscle.
Lee JM; Han YD; Cho MS; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jul; 34(7):3043-3050. PubMed ID: 31482361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can MRI pelvimetry predict the technical difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery?
Hong JSY; De Robles MS; Brown C; Brown KGM; Young CJ; Solomon MJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Dec; 36(12):2613-2620. PubMed ID: 34338870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior mesorectal thickness as a predictor of increased operative time in rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
McKechnie T; Ramji K; Kruse C; Jaffer H; Rebello R; Amin N; Doumouras AG; Hong D; Eskicioglu C
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3520-3532. PubMed ID: 34382121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of pelvic dimensions on anastomotic leak after anterior resection for patients with rectal cancer.
Yu ZL; Liu XH; Liu HS; Ke J; Zou YF; Cao WT; Xiao J; Zhou ZY; Lan P; Wu XJ; Wu XR
Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2134-2143. PubMed ID: 32410082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].
Sun R; Cong L; Qiu HZ; Lin GL; Wu B; Niu BZ; Sun XY; Zhou JL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 25(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 35754217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
