These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36404724)
21. Striking a balance: conscientious objection and reproductive health care from the Colombian perspective. Cabal L; Olaya MA; Robledo VM Health Hum Rights; 2014 Dec; 16(2):E73-83. PubMed ID: 25569726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape. Baron CH Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. "Pro-life" absolutes, feminist challenges: the fundamentalist narrative of Irish abortion law 1986-1992. Fletcher R Osgoode Hall Law J; 1998; 36(1):1-62. PubMed ID: 16184660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Criminalisation under scrutiny: how constitutional courts are changing their narrative by using public health evidence in abortion cases. Undurraga V Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2019 Dec; 27(1):1620552. PubMed ID: 31533574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Opinion No. 4/87, 14 November 1987. Spain. Fiscal General Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():38. PubMed ID: 12289552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Medical abortion and manual vacuum aspiration for legal abortion protect women's health and reduce costs to the health system: findings from Colombia. Rodriguez MI; Mendoza WS; Guerra-Palacio C; Guzman NA; Tolosa JE Reprod Health Matters; 2015 Feb; 22(44 Suppl 1):125-33. PubMed ID: 25702076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden. United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation. Will JF Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Sep; 50(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 33095492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Freedom of conscience, professional responsibility, and access to abortion. Dresser RS J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 7749485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Australia: Abortion and Human Rights. Sifris R; Belton S Health Hum Rights; 2017 Jun; 19(1):209-220. PubMed ID: 28630553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Access to medical-assisted reproduction and pgd in Italian law: a deadly blow to an illiberal statute? commentary to the European Court on Human Rights's decision Costa and Pavan v Italy (ECtHR, 28 August 2012, App. 54270/2010). Biondi S Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(3):474-86. PubMed ID: 23552505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision. Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 2603862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences. Koslov TI Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Morgentaler judgment: constitutional rights, legislative intention, and institutional design. Weinrib LE Univ Tor Law J; 1992; 42(1):22-76. PubMed ID: 11656266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed. Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany. Morris DG Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]