These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36405629)

  • 21. Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Lewis DE; Smith NA; Spalding JL; Valente DL
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):783-794. PubMed ID: 29252979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Crossmodal plasticity in auditory, visual and multisensory cortical areas following noise-induced hearing loss in adulthood.
    Schormans AL; Typlt M; Allman BL
    Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():92-107. PubMed ID: 27387138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changes in Speech-Related Brain Activity During Adaptation to Electro-Acoustic Hearing.
    Balkenhol T; Wallhäusser-Franke E; Rotter N; Servais JJ
    Front Neurol; 2020; 11():161. PubMed ID: 32300327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid: Objective Measures of Binaural Benefit.
    Balkenhol T; Wallhäusser-Franke E; Rotter N; Servais JJ
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():586119. PubMed ID: 33381008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. McGurk effects in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.
    Rouger J; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1188():87-99. PubMed ID: 18062941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recovery function of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Zhang F; Samy RN; Anderson JM; Houston L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):397-408. PubMed ID: 19928394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of stimulus modality, task complexity, and cuing on working memory and the relationship with speech recognition in older cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Azuma T; Kolberg C; Pulling KR
    J Commun Disord; 2022; 95():106170. PubMed ID: 34839068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Audiovisual sentence repetition as a clinical criterion for auditory development in Persian-language children with hearing loss.
    Oryadi-Zanjani MM; Vahab M; Rahimi Z; Mayahi A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 93():167-171. PubMed ID: 28109491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):110-123. PubMed ID: 28787316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multisensory Integration-Attention Trade-Off in Cochlear-Implanted Deaf Individuals.
    van de Rijt LPH; van Opstal AJ; van Wanrooij MM
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():683804. PubMed ID: 34393707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recognition of Accented Speech by Cochlear-Implant Listeners: Benefit of Audiovisual Cues.
    Waddington E; Jaekel BN; Tinnemore AR; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1236-1250. PubMed ID: 32069269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Music Is More Enjoyable With Two Ears, Even If One of Them Receives a Degraded Signal Provided By a Cochlear Implant.
    Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Stupak N; Lavender A; Neukam J; Van de Heyning P; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):476-490. PubMed ID: 31469701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consequences of Stimulus Type on Higher-Order Processing in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
    Finke M; Sandmann P; Bönitz H; Kral A; Büchner A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(5):305-315. PubMed ID: 27866186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Xie Z; Stakhovskaya O; Goupell MJ; Anderson S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):719-740. PubMed ID: 34231111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
    Jeong SW; Kang MY; Kim LS
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Audio-visual speech perception in noise: Implanted children and young adults versus normal hearing peers.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Fostick L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 92():146-150. PubMed ID: 28012517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bilateral input protects the cortex from unilaterally-driven reorganization in children who are deaf.
    Gordon KA; Wong DD; Papsin BC
    Brain; 2013 May; 136(Pt 5):1609-25. PubMed ID: 23576127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.