These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 364058)
41. [Clinical study of a copper IUD, T Cu 200]. Viollet MF; Cohen J; Merger R Gynecologie; 1975 Jan; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 1095434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The use of a modified copper intrauterine device in nulliparous women with small uterine axial length. Goldstuck ND J Reprod Med; 1980 Oct; 25(4):183-6. PubMed ID: 7431367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Performance of the Dalkon Shield intrauterine device. Jones RW N Z Med J; 1975 Aug; 82(545):85-7. PubMed ID: 1058347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Intrauterine contraception with copper-T 200 device- a retrospective analysis of 334 cases (author's transl)]. Salzer H; Schneider WH; Eppel W Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1981 May; 93(11):354-8. PubMed ID: 7269615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Insertion of intra-uterine devices. Some technical considerations: II. Goldstuck ND Practitioner; 1982 Jul; 226(1369):1319-23. PubMed ID: 7111168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Control methods of intrauterine contraceptive devices]. Vajda R; Kun L Zentralbl Gynakol; 1976; 98(9):554-8. PubMed ID: 936821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Perforation of the uterine wall into the abdominal cavity by the IUD]. Andersson K; Bagger P Lakartidningen; 1977 Sep; 74(36):3001-2. PubMed ID: 561279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Intrauterine device termination rates and the menstrual cycle day of insertion. White MK; Ory HW; Rooks JB; Rochat RW Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Feb; 55(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 7352085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Correlative clinical and morphological findings in women using IUD. Baveja A; Varma HC; Samant V J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1975 Dec; 25(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 1228036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Use of intrauterine devices in the treatment of functional sterilities. Murayama S Nihon Funin Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jan; 19(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 4478809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Loop vs. shield: a competing risks analysis of IUD termination. Herson J; Crocker CL; Butts E Contraception; 1976 Jul; 14(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 975812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Diagnostic ultrasound and the intrauterine pessary]. Popov I; Stoĭkov S; Penkov V Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1999; 38(4):51-4. PubMed ID: 10726356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Which analgesic is efficient prior to intrauterine device insertion? Abbas AM Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2017 Dec; 22(6):480. PubMed ID: 29043864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of long-term insertion of I.U.D. on human endometrium. Shahani SM; Kothari UR J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1973 Apr; 23(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 4806733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [Influence of IUD on uterine contractility]. Magoshi S Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 May; 24(5):373-81. PubMed ID: 5065607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]