These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36408185)

  • 1. Breast cancer diagnosis using frequency decomposition of surface motion of actuated breast tissue.
    Fitzjohn J; Zhou C; Chase JG
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():969530. PubMed ID: 36408185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling viscous damping in actuated breast tissue to provide diagnostic insight for breast cancer: A proof-of-concept analysis.
    Fitzjohn JL; Zhou C; Chase JG; Ormsby Z; Haggers M
    Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):4978-4992. PubMed ID: 34174093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of surface based non-invasive breast cancer screening with digital image based Elasto tomography (DIET).
    Lotz T; Simpson PD; Stocker D; Hann CE; Chase JG
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3077-80. PubMed ID: 21095738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separate modal analysis for tumor detection with a digital image elasto tomography (DIET) breast cancer screening system.
    Kashif AS; Lotz TF; Heeren AM; Chase JG
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):113503. PubMed ID: 24320474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
    Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Hendrick E; Yaffe M; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett L; D'Orsi C; Jong R; Rebner M;
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1773-83. PubMed ID: 16169887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.
    Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Yaffe MJ; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Cormack JB; Hanna LA; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Jong RA; Rebner M; Tosteson AN; Gatsonis CA;
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 18227537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additive value of exposure parameters for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammography.
    Ma L; Lin X; Lai B; Wang W; Cai Y; Chen W; Qin G
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2539-2547. PubMed ID: 32979051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Local Tumor Staging of Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis.
    Fontaine M; Tourasse C; Pages E; Laurent N; Laffargue G; Millet I; Molinari N; Taourel P
    Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 30964425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency in breast malignancy between cone beam breast CT and mammography in dense breast].
    Liu AD; Ma Y; Yin L; Han P; Li HJ; Ye ZX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 40(8):604-609. PubMed ID: 30139031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy.
    Hadadi I; Rae W; Clarke J; McEntee M; Ekpo E
    Acta Radiol Open; 2022 Jan; 11(1):20584601211072279. PubMed ID: 35111337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150743. PubMed ID: 27072391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
    Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
    Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
    Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.
    Cole EB; Pisano ED; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Brown ME; Feig SA; Jong RA; Maidment AD; Staiger MJ; Kuzmiak CM; Freimanis RI; Lesko N; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Williford M; Braeuning MP
    Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 12511684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis and breast ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a prospective comparison study.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Lee J; Chu AJ; Seo M; Gweon HM; Koo HR; Lee SH; Cho N; Bae MS; Shin SU; Song SE; Moon WK
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Feb; 162(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 28083822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.
    Lei J; Yang P; Zhang L; Wang Y; Yang K
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):595-602. PubMed ID: 24121712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts.
    Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatially tracked whole-breast three-dimensional ultrasound system toward point-of-care breast cancer screening in high-risk women with dense breasts.
    Park CKS; Xing S; Papernick S; Orlando N; Knull E; Toit CD; Bax JS; Gardi L; Barker K; Tessier D; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3944-3962. PubMed ID: 35319105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.