152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36409422)
1. What is the role of breast MRI in the management of women with pathologic nipple discharge and normal conventional imaging?
Avdan Aslan A; Gültekin S
Ir J Med Sci; 2023 Oct; 192(5):2331-2335. PubMed ID: 36409422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study.
Boisserie-Lacroix M; Doutriaux-Dumoulin I; Chopier J; Boyer B; Depetiteville MP; Hoppe S; Brouste V; Chamming's F
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7783-7791. PubMed ID: 33846843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. JOURNAL CLUB: Diagnostic Utility of MRI After Negative or Inconclusive Mammography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge.
Bahl M; Gadd MA; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1404-1410. PubMed ID: 28898125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis in female patients with nipple discharge.
Barsic Ostojic S; Grbanovic L; Tonklin A; Kovacevic L; Marusic Z; Prutki M
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Oct; 5(10):e1602. PubMed ID: 35142103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nipple Discharge: Current Clinical and Imaging Evaluation.
Gupta D; Mendelson EB; Karst I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Feb; 216(2):330-339. PubMed ID: 33295815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective statistical analysis on the diagnostic value of ductography based on lesion pathology in patients presenting with nipple discharge.
Srinivasan A; Nia E; Gupta M; Sun J; Leung JW
Breast J; 2019 Jul; 25(4):585-589. PubMed ID: 31087380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is Ductography Still Warranted in the 21st century?
Baydoun S; Gonzalez P; Whitman GJ; Dryden M; Xi Y; Dogan B
Breast J; 2019 Jul; 25(4):654-662. PubMed ID: 31087408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge: What is the Added Diagnostic Value of MRI?
Bahl M; Baker JA; Greenup RA; Ghate SV
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S435-41. PubMed ID: 26249144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Value of Adding Ductography to Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge in Women with Negative Mammography.
Choi Y; Kim SM; Jang M; Yun B; Kang E; Kim EK; Park SY; Kim B; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 23(9):866-877. PubMed ID: 36047541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nipple Discharge Imaging Evaluation with Mammography, Ultrasound, Galactography, and MRI.
Chung HL; Bevers TB; Legha RS; Speer ME; Tso HH; Sun J; Leung JWT
Acad Radiol; 2023 May; 30(5):783-797. PubMed ID: 35760711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Performance of MRI Versus Galactography in Women With Pathologic Nipple Discharge: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Berger N; Luparia A; Di Leo G; Carbonaro LA; Trimboli RM; Ambrogi F; Sardanelli F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):465-471. PubMed ID: 28537847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can we see what is invisible? The role of MRI in the evaluation and management of patients with pathological nipple discharge.
Zacharioudakis K; Kontoulis T; Vella JX; Zhao J; Ramakrishnan R; Cunningham DA; Mufti RA; Leff DR; Thiruchelvam P; Hogben K; Hadjiminas DJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Nov; 178(1):115-120. PubMed ID: 31352554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison Between Ultrasonography and Galactography in Detecting Lesions in Patients With Pathologic Nipple Discharge.
Jung HK; Park YM; Baek HJ; Choo HJ; Kim EK; Kim DW; Lee SJ; Lee JH
Ultrasound Q; 2019 Mar; 35(1):93-98. PubMed ID: 29768286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study.
Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; De Felice C; Meggiorini ML; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM
Radiol Med; 2008 Mar; 113(2):249-64. PubMed ID: 18386126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail.
Lubina N; Schedelbeck U; Roth A; Weng AM; Geissinger E; Hönig A; Hahn D; Bley TA
Eur Radiol; 2015 May; 25(5):1285-93. PubMed ID: 25433415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adding Ultrasound to the Evaluation of Patients with Pathologic Nipple Discharge to Diagnose Additional Breast Cancers: Preliminary Data.
Yoon H; Yoon JH; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Park BW; Kim MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):2099-107. PubMed ID: 25952162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implications of nipple discharge in Hong Kong Chinese women.
Kan WM; Chen C; Kwong A
Hong Kong Med J; 2018 Feb; 24(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 29302019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic value of nipple discharge cytology: breast imaging complements predictive value of nipple discharge cytology.
Kalu ON; Chow C; Wheeler A; Kong C; Wapnir I
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Sep; 106(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 22396104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
