BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36409497)

  • 1. External Validation of an Ensemble Model for Automated Mammography Interpretation by Artificial Intelligence.
    Hsu W; Hippe DS; Nakhaei N; Wang PC; Zhu B; Siu N; Ahsen ME; Lotter W; Sorensen AG; Naeim A; Buist DSM; Schaffter T; Guinney J; Elmore JG; Lee CI
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Nov; 5(11):e2242343. PubMed ID: 36409497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms.
    Schaffter T; Buist DSM; Lee CI; Nikulin Y; Ribli D; Guan Y; Lotter W; Jie Z; Du H; Wang S; Feng J; Feng M; Kim HE; Albiol F; Albiol A; Morrell S; Wojna Z; Ahsen ME; Asif U; Jimeno Yepes A; Yohanandan S; Rabinovici-Cohen S; Yi D; Hoff B; Yu T; Chaibub Neto E; Rubin DL; Lindholm P; Margolies LR; McBride RB; Rothstein JH; Sieh W; Ben-Ari R; Harrer S; Trister A; Friend S; Norman T; Sahiner B; Strand F; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; ; Mackey L; Cahoon J; Shen L; Sohn JH; Trivedi H; Shen Y; Buturovic L; Pereira JC; Cardoso JS; Castro E; Kalleberg KT; Pelka O; Nedjar I; Geras KJ; Nensa F; Goan E; Koitka S; Caballero L; Cox DD; Krishnaswamy P; Pandey G; Friedrich CM; Perrin D; Fookes C; Shi B; Cardoso Negrie G; Kawczynski M; Cho K; Khoo CS; Lo JY; Sorensen AG; Jung H
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e200265. PubMed ID: 32119094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.
    Salim M; Wåhlin E; Dembrower K; Azavedo E; Foukakis T; Liu Y; Smith K; Eklund M; Strand F
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 32852536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining the strengths of radiologists and AI for breast cancer screening: a retrospective analysis.
    Leibig C; Brehmer M; Bunk S; Byng D; Pinker K; Umutlu L
    Lancet Digit Health; 2022 Jul; 4(7):e507-e519. PubMed ID: 35750400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.
    Lång K; Josefsson V; Larsson AM; Larsson S; Högberg C; Sartor H; Hofvind S; Andersson I; Rosso A
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):936-944. PubMed ID: 37541274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of artificial intelligence contrast mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer: Relationship to histopathological results.
    Helal M; Khaled R; Alfarghaly O; Mokhtar O; Elkorany A; Fahmy A; El Kassas H
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111392. PubMed ID: 38428255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.
    Kim HE; Kim HH; Han BK; Kim KH; Han K; Nam H; Lee EH; Kim EK
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Mar; 2(3):e138-e148. PubMed ID: 33334578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Pinto MC; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Pedersen K; Hofvind S; Wicklein J; Kappler S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):529-536. PubMed ID: 34227882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Independent External Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Automated Interpretation of Screening Mammography: A Systematic Review.
    Anderson AW; Marinovich ML; Houssami N; Lowry KP; Elmore JG; Buist DSM; Hofvind S; Lee CI
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2022 Feb; 19(2 Pt A):259-273. PubMed ID: 35065909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial intelligence (AI) for breast cancer screening: BreastScreen population-based cohort study of cancer detection.
    Marinovich ML; Wylie E; Lotter W; Lund H; Waddell A; Madeley C; Pereira G; Houssami N
    EBioMedicine; 2023 Apr; 90():104498. PubMed ID: 36863255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Unnecessary Recalls at Screening Mammography: A Simulation Study.
    Kim YS; Jang MJ; Lee SH; Kim SY; Ha SM; Kwon BR; Moon WK; Chang JM
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 Dec; 23(12):1241-1250. PubMed ID: 36447412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.
    Kim H; Choi JS; Kim K; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7186-7198. PubMed ID: 37188881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the Performance of Radiologists Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection Support Software for Mammography: A Multi-Reader Study.
    Lee JH; Kim KH; Lee EH; Ahn JS; Ryu JK; Park YM; Shin GW; Kim YJ; Choi HY
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 May; 23(5):505-516. PubMed ID: 35434976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway.
    Larsen M; Olstad CF; Lee CI; Hovda T; Hoff SR; Martiniussen MA; Mikalsen KØ; Lund-Hanssen H; Solli HS; Silberhorn M; Sulheim ÅØ; Auensen S; Nygård JF; Hofvind S
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230375. PubMed ID: 38597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists.
    Kim JG; Haslam B; Diab AR; Sakhare A; Grisot G; Lee H; Holt J; Lee CI; Lotter W; Sorensen AG
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230137. PubMed ID: 38323914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Shoshan Y; Bakalo R; Gilboa-Solomon F; Ratner V; Barkan E; Ozery-Flato M; Amit M; Khapun D; Ambinder EB; Oluyemi ET; Panigrahi B; DiCarlo PA; Rosen-Zvi M; Mullen LA
    Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 35040677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
    Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
    Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.
    van Winkel SL; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Appelman L; Gubern-Mérida A; Karssemeijer N; Teuwen J; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8682-8691. PubMed ID: 33948701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Data Set and Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Masses and Architectural Distortions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
    Buda M; Saha A; Walsh R; Ghate S; Li N; Swiecicki A; Lo JY; Mazurowski MA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2119100. PubMed ID: 34398205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.