BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36409511)

  • 1. Use Trends and Recent Expenditures for Cervical Cancer Screening-Associated Services in Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Older Than 65 Years.
    Qin J; Holt HK; Richards TB; Saraiya M; Sawaya GF
    JAMA Intern Med; 2023 Jan; 183(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 36409511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing: a pooled analysis using the data from 13 population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.
    Pan QJ; Hu SY; Guo HQ; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Chen W; Cao J; Jiang Y; Zhao FH; Qiao YL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24631450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of US Preventive Services Task Force Guideline-Concordant Cervical Cancer Screening Rates and Reasons for Underscreening by Age, Race and Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, Rurality, and Insurance, 2005 to 2019.
    Suk R; Hong YR; Rajan SS; Xie Z; Zhu Y; Spencer JC
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Jan; 5(1):e2143582. PubMed ID: 35040970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
    Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
    PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
    Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
    Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
    Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of screening performance between primary high-risk HPV screening and high-risk HPV screening plus liquid-based cytology cotesting in diagnosis of cervical precancerous or cancerous lesions].
    Zhao XL; Remila R; Hu SY; Zhang L; Xu XQ; Chen F; Pan QJ; Zhang X; Zhao FH
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 May; 52(5):469-474. PubMed ID: 29747337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
    Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
    Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing to screen for cervical cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Whitlock EP; Vesco KK; Eder M; Lin JS; Senger CA; Burda BU
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Nov; 155(10):687-97, W214-5. PubMed ID: 22006930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in the use of cervical cancer screening tests in a large medical claims database, United States, 2013-2019.
    Qin J; Shahangian S; Saraiya M; Holt H; Gagnon M; Sawaya GF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 163(2):378-384. PubMed ID: 34507826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test.
    Ronco G; Giorgi-Rossi P; Carozzi F; Confortini M; Dalla Palma P; Del Mistro A; Gillio-Tos A; Minucci D; Naldoni C; Rizzolo R; Schincaglia P; Volante R; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Cuzick J; Segnan N;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):492-501. PubMed ID: 18364502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Real-world research on cervical cancer screening program and effect evaluation for Chinese population].
    Zhao YQ; Dai Y; Dang L; Kong LH; Zhang Y; Feng RM; Qiao YL; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 40(10):764-771. PubMed ID: 30392341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies.
    Pista A; Costa C; Saldanha C; Moutinho JAF; Moutinho JM; Arrobas F; Catalão C; Kempers J
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):235. PubMed ID: 30808324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
    Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
    JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.