These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36409707)
1. Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications. Watamura E; Ioku T PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277939. PubMed ID: 36409707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Justification of Sentencing Decisions: Development of a Ratio-Based Measure Tested on Child Neglect Cases. Watamura E; Ioku T; Wakebe T Front Psychol; 2021; 12():761536. PubMed ID: 35095646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions of custody: Similarities and disparities among police, judges, social psychologists, and laypeople. Alceste F; Kassin SM Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):197-214. PubMed ID: 34351203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Crime and punishment in Saudi Arabia: Lashing, imprisonment, and other unusual punishments. Boateng FD; Pryce DK; Alotaibi HA Child Abuse Negl; 2023 Jan; 135():105948. PubMed ID: 36395699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bio-behavioral scientific evidence alters judges' sentencing decision-making: A quantitative analysis. Thomaidou MA; Berryessa CM Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 95():102007. PubMed ID: 38991330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Public support for sentencing reform: A policy-capturing experiment. Vardsveen TC; Wiener RL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):430-446. PubMed ID: 33779195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nudges for Judges: An Experiment on the Effect of Making Sentencing Costs Explicit. Aharoni E; Kleider-Offutt HM; Brosnan SF; Hoffman MB Front Psychol; 2022; 13():889933. PubMed ID: 35712212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do moral intuitions influence judges' sentencing decisions? A multilevel study of criminal court sentencing in Pennsylvania. Silver E; Ulmer JT; Silver JR Soc Sci Res; 2023 Sep; 115():102927. PubMed ID: 37858364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The double-edged sword: does biomechanism increase or decrease judges' sentencing of psychopaths? Aspinwall LG; Brown TR; Tabery J Science; 2012 Aug; 337(6096):846-9. PubMed ID: 22904010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imprisonment for non-intentional transmission of HIV: can it be supported using established principles for justifying criminal sentencing? Phillips M; Sukthankar A Sex Transm Infect; 2013 Jun; 89(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 23580609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cooperative guardian offenders and sentencing outcomes: Evidence from criminal sentencing documents of child trafficking crime in China. Xin Y; Cai T Child Abuse Negl; 2022 Feb; 124():105449. PubMed ID: 34922261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychometric and Perceptometric Comparisons of the Perspectives of Orthodontists, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and Laypeople of Different Ages and Sexes towards Beauty of Female Jaw Angles (Intergonial Widths and Gonial Heights) on Frontal and Three-Quarter Views. Moradinejad M; Rekabi A; Ashtiani AH; Atashkar N; Rakhshan V Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():2595662. PubMed ID: 36398071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Judges' knowledge about sexual offenders, difficulties presiding over sexual offense cases, and opinions on sentencing, treatment, and legislation. Bumby KM; Maddox MC Sex Abuse; 1999 Oct; 11(4):305-15. PubMed ID: 10597646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Slippery scales: Cost prompts, but not benefit prompts, modulate sentencing recommendations in laypeople. Aharoni E; Kleider-Offutt HM; Brosnan SF; Fernandes S PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236764. PubMed ID: 32735624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Directionality in Aesthetic Judgments and Performance Evaluation: Sport Judges and Laypeople Compared. Loffing F; Nickel S; Hagemann N Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2109. PubMed ID: 29259568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial. Mousavi SM; Saeidi Ghorani P; Deilamani A; Rakhshan V Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 23(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 31446526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How judges sentence DUI offenders: an experimental study. Lange TJ; Greene E Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 1990; 16(1-2):125-33. PubMed ID: 2330933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Jurors' and Judges' Evaluation of Defendants with Autism and the Impact on Sentencing: A Systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Review of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Courtroom. Allely CS; Cooper P J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 25(1):105-123. PubMed ID: 29978627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does Gender Affect Judges' Perceptions of Sexual Assault Cases? Burgstedt C; Beeby A; Hayne H; Hobbs L; Gross J; Patterson T J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jan; 38(1-2):NP466-NP508. PubMed ID: 35435767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Use of Alcohol and/or Drugs in Intimate Partner Homicide: Themes in Judges' Sentencing Remarks. Whittle M; Hall G Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(3):404-416. PubMed ID: 31984028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]