These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36409707)

  • 21. The Use of Alcohol and/or Drugs in Intimate Partner Homicide: Themes in Judges' Sentencing Remarks.
    Whittle M; Hall G
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(3):404-416. PubMed ID: 31984028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exploring the educative role of judges' sentencing remarks: an analysis of remarks on child exploitation material.
    Hunn CM; Cockburn H; Spiranovic C; Prichard J
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(6):811-828. PubMed ID: 31984054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Justice at any cost? The impact of cost-benefit salience on criminal punishment judgments.
    Aharoni E; Kleider-Offutt HM; Brosnan SF; Watzek J
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):38-60. PubMed ID: 30474239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The potential influence of criminological rationales in considering childhood abuse as mitigating to sentencing.
    Berryessa CM
    Child Abuse Negl; 2021 Jan; 111():104818. PubMed ID: 33223305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of risk assessment on judges' fairness in sentencing relatively poor defendants.
    Skeem J; Scurich N; Monahan J
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 31928034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How bad is a 10% chance of losing a toe? Judgments of probabilistic conditions by doctors and laypeople.
    Gurmankin Levy A; Baron J
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1399-406. PubMed ID: 16615387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A "change-of-standard" perspective on the relations among context, judgment, and memory.
    Higgins ET; Stangor C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Feb; 54(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 3346810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intimate Partner Homicide: Themes in Judges' Sentencing Remarks.
    Whittle M; Hall G
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(6):922-943. PubMed ID: 31984058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship between judges' scores and dive attributes from a video recording of a diving competition.
    Luedeker B; McGee M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273374. PubMed ID: 36001647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Movement Prototypes in a Complex Teamgym Gymnastics Technique on the Vaulting Table and Their Relationship with Judges' Scores.
    Barreto J; Henriques R; Cabral S; Pedro B; Peixoto C; Veloso A
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differences in Lip Support with and without Labial Flanges in a Maxillary Edentulous Population - Part 3: Unblinded and Discriminatory Subjective Analysis.
    Bidra AS; Nguyen V; Manzotti A; Kuo CL
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 28561382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identification of children's stuttered and nonstuttered speech by highly experienced judges: binary judgments and comparisons with disfluency-types definitions.
    Bothe AK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 18658057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A study of auxiliary factors for judges in sentencing dangerous driving offenses - the mediating role of favorable and unfavorable factors.
    Liu C; Miao Z; Wang T
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1202518. PubMed ID: 37794902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Judging the judges' performance in rhythmic gymnastics.
    Flessas K; Mylonas D; Panagiotaropoulou G; Tsopani D; Korda A; Siettos C; Di Cagno A; Evdokimidis I; Smyrnis N
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Mar; 47(3):640-8. PubMed ID: 24977695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Judges', lay judges', and police officers' beliefs about factors affecting children's testimony about sexual abuse.
    Leander L; Christianson SA; Svedin CG; Granhag PA
    J Psychol; 2007 Jul; 141(4):341-57. PubMed ID: 17725070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. From discretion to disagreement: explaining disparities in judges' pretrial decisions.
    Dhami MK
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(3):367-86. PubMed ID: 15549716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting sentencing for low-level crimes: comparing models of human judgment.
    von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):375-95. PubMed ID: 20025422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Judges' views of child sexual abuse: evaluating beliefs against research findings in a Finnish sample.
    Korkman J; Svanbäck J; Finnilä K; Santtila P
    Scand J Psychol; 2014 Oct; 55(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 25040839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Judging judges: How do children weigh the importance of capability and objectivity for being a good decision maker?
    Mills CM; Landrum AR
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Sep; 30(Pt 3):393-414. PubMed ID: 22882370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of neuroscientific evidence on sentencing depends on how one conceives of reasons for incarceration.
    Perricone A; Baskin-Sommers A; Ahn WK
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0276237. PubMed ID: 36322534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.