These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36409840)

  • 41. The influence of coagulant type on the biological treatment of sewage sludge.
    Cainglet A; Kujala K; Liimatainen M; Prokkola H; Piippo S; Postila H; Ronkanen AK; Heiderscheidt E
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Apr; 869():161706. PubMed ID: 36682549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Economic, technical, and environmental evaluation of retrofitting scenarios in a full-scale industrial wastewater treatment system.
    Monje V; Owsianiak M; Junicke H; Kjellberg K; Gernaey KV; Flores-Alsina X
    Water Res; 2022 Sep; 223():118997. PubMed ID: 36029698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of flotation sludge from broiler chicken slaughter and sweet potato: Nutrients and energy recovery.
    Damaceno FM; Buligon EL; Pires Salcedo Restrepo JC; Chiarelotto M; Niedzialkoski RK; de Mendonça Costa LA; de Lucas Junior J; de Mendonça Costa MSS
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Sep; 683():773-781. PubMed ID: 31150897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors for enhanced valorization of urban organic wastes: Achievements, limitations, energy balance and future perspectives.
    Hu Y; Cai X; Du R; Yang Y; Rong C; Qin Y; Li YY
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 820():153284. PubMed ID: 35066041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Feasibility Analysis on the Adoption of Decentralized Anaerobic Co-Digestion for the Treatment of Municipal Organic Waste with Energy Recovery in Urban Districts of Metropolitan Areas.
    Gadaleta G; De Gisi S; Notarnicola M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33668458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of two types of sludge on the biogas production of assorted waste streams and the significance of beef cattle waste and liquid cheese whey in the organic fraction of municipal solid waste.
    Peña-Vargas MY; Durán-Moreno A
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2018; 53(14):1235-1242. PubMed ID: 30623715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biogas production from high solids anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, yard waste and waste activated sludge.
    Lee E; Bittencourt P; Casimir L; Jimenez E; Wang M; Zhang Q; Ergas SJ
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():432-439. PubMed ID: 31351629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative assessment of sewage sludge disposal alternatives in Mashhad: a life cycle perspective.
    Rostami F; Tafazzoli SM; Aminian ST; Avami A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(1):315-333. PubMed ID: 31786757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Environmental impact of submerged anaerobic MBR (SAnMBR) technology used to treat urban wastewater at different temperatures.
    Pretel R; Robles A; Ruano MV; Seco A; Ferrer J
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 149():532-40. PubMed ID: 24119499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Use of Alum for Odor Reduction in Sludge and Biosolids from Different Wastewater Treatment Processes.
    Gruchlik Y; Fouché L; Joll CA; Heitz A
    Water Environ Res; 2017 Dec; 89(12):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 29166992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Potential agronomic and environmental properties of thermophilic anaerobically digested municipal sewage sludge measured by an unsupervised and a supervised chemometric approach.
    Scaglia B; Tambone F; Corno L; Orzi V; Lazzarini Y; Garuti G; Adani F
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Oct; 637-638():791-802. PubMed ID: 29758434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluating the impact of substrate addition for anaerobic co-digestion on biogas production and digestate quality: The case of deinking sludge.
    Bareha Y; Faucher JP; Michel M; Houdon M; Vaneeckhaute C
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 319():115657. PubMed ID: 35842989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of microwave pre-treatment of thickened waste activated sludge on biogas production from co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, thickened waste activated sludge and municipal sludge.
    Ara E; Sartaj M; Kennedy K
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Dec; 32(12):1200-9. PubMed ID: 25398411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The influence of decreased hydraulic retention time on the performance and stability of co-digestion of sewage sludge with grease trap sludge and organic fraction of municipal waste.
    Grosser A
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 203(Pt 3):1143-1157. PubMed ID: 28468730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Environmental impacts of phosphorus recovery from a "product" Life Cycle Assessment perspective: Allocating burdens of wastewater treatment in the production of sludge-based phosphate fertilizers.
    Pradel M; Aissani L
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 656():55-69. PubMed ID: 30502735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Co-management of domestic wastewater and food waste: A life cycle comparison of alternative food waste diversion strategies.
    Becker AM; Yu K; Stadler LB; Smith AL
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jan; 223():131-140. PubMed ID: 27788426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal food waste and sewage sludge: A comparative life cycle assessment in the context of a waste service provision.
    Edwards J; Othman M; Crossin E; Burn S
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jan; 223():237-249. PubMed ID: 27794271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Improvement of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge in a wastewater treatment plant by means of mechanical and thermal pre-treatments: Performance, energy and economical assessment.
    Ruffino B; Campo G; Genon G; Lorenzi E; Novarino D; Scibilia G; Zanetti M
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Jan; 175():298-308. PubMed ID: 25459836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Advancing sustainable wastewater management: A comprehensive review of nutrient recovery products and their applications.
    Śniatała B; Al-Hazmi HE; Sobotka D; Zhai J; Mąkinia J
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Aug; 937():173446. PubMed ID: 38788940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Using mass struvite precipitation to remove recalcitrant nutrients and micropollutants from anaerobic digestion dewatering centrate.
    Abel-Denee M; Abbott T; Eskicioglu C
    Water Res; 2018 Apr; 132():292-300. PubMed ID: 29334648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.