282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36410231)
1. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.
Turner KM; Delman AM; Johnson K; Patel SH; Wilson GC; Shah SA; Van Haren RM
J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():152-160. PubMed ID: 36410231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term survival outcomes associated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.
Byiringiro I; Aurit SJ; Nandipati KC
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):4018-4027. PubMed ID: 36097100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.
Haruštiak T; Jaroščiaková S; Šnajdauf M; Pazdro A; Lischke R
Rozhl Chir; 2023; 102(11):422-429. PubMed ID: 38290818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic Esophagectomy Trends and Early Surgical Outcomes: The US Experience.
Khaitan PG; Vekstein AM; Thibault D; Kosinski A; Hartwig MG; Block M; Gaissert H; Wolf AS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 115(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 36470561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
Weksler B; Sullivan JL
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic versus open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate.
Weindelmayer J; De Pasqual CA; Turolo C; Gervasi MC; Sacco M; Bencivenga M; Giacopuzzi S
J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 127(7):1109-1115. PubMed ID: 36971002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of robotic versus non-robotic minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP database analysis.
Harbison GJ; Vossler JD; Yim NH; Murayama KM
Am J Surg; 2019 Dec; 218(6):1223-1228. PubMed ID: 31500797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
Capovilla G; Hadzijusufovic E; Tagkalos E; Froiio C; Berlth F; Mann C; Staubitz J; Uzun E; Lang H; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Aug; 35(8):. PubMed ID: 34979549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy Reduces Sarcopenia within the First Postoperative Year: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Merboth F; Nebelung H; Wotschel N; Liebscher H; Eckert F; von Renesse J; Hasanovic J; Welsch T; Fritzmann J; Stange DE; Plodeck V; Hoffmann RT; Distler M; Weitz J; Kirchberg J
J Thorac Oncol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):232-244. PubMed ID: 36343921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Circular vs. linear stapling after minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a pooled analysis.
Finze A; Betzler J; Hetjens S; Reissfelder C; Otto M; Blank S
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Aug; 407(5):1831-1838. PubMed ID: 35731445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of 350 Robotic-assisted Esophagectomies at a High-volume Cancer Center: A Contemporary Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
Pointer DT; Saeed S; Naffouje SA; Mehta R; Hoffe SE; Dineen SP; Fleming JB; Fontaine JP; Pimiento JM
Ann Surg; 2022 Jul; 276(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 33201093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
