187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36410482)
1. Evaluation of a water arsenic filter in a participatory intervention to reduce arsenic exposure in American Indian communities: The Strong Heart Water Study.
Zacher T; Endres K; Richards F; Robe LB; Powers M; Yracheta J; Harvey D; Best LG; Red Cloud R; Black Bear A; Ristau S; Aurand D; Skinner L; Cuny C; Gross M; Thomas E; Rule A; Schwab KJ; O'Leary M; Moulton LH; Navas-Acien A; George CM
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Mar; 862():160217. PubMed ID: 36410482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Behavioral determinants of arsenic-safe water use among Great Plains Indian Nation private well users: results from the Community-Led Strong Heart Water Study Arsenic Mitigation Program.
Endres K; Zacher T; Richards F; Bear Robe L; Powers M; Yracheta J; Harvey D; Best LG; Red Cloud R; Black Bear A; Ristau S; Aurand D; Skinner L; Perin J; Cuny C; Gross M; Thomas ED; Rule A; Schwab K; Moulton LH; O'Leary M; Navas-Acien A; George CM
Environ Health; 2023 May; 22(1):42. PubMed ID: 37183246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementing a Community-Led Arsenic Mitigation Intervention for Private Well Users in American Indian Communities: A Qualitative Evaluation of the Strong Heart Water Study Program.
Anderson DM; Bear AB; Zacher T; Endres K; Saxton R; Richards F; Robe LB; Harvey D; Best LG; Cloud RR; Thomas ED; Gittelsohn J; O'Leary M; Navas-Acien A; George CM
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36768048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Arsenic in groundwater in private wells in rural North Dakota and South Dakota: Water quality assessment for an intervention trial.
Powers M; Yracheta J; Harvey D; O'Leary M; Best LG; Black Bear A; MacDonald L; Susan J; Hasan K; Thomas E; Morgan C; Olmedo P; Chen R; Rule A; Schwab K; Navas-Acien A; George CM
Environ Res; 2019 Jan; 168():41-47. PubMed ID: 30261340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Faucet-mounted point-of-use drinking water filters to improve water quality in households served by private wells.
Patton H; Krometis LA; Ling E; Cohen A; Sarver E
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 906():167252. PubMed ID: 37742971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using an environmental public health tracking biomonitoring study to validate safe water restoration efforts in Florida.
Jordan M; DuClos C; Kintziger K; Gray A; Bonometti MA
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2015; 21 Suppl 2():S75-9. PubMed ID: 25621450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Strong Heart Water Study: Informing and designing a multi-level intervention to reduce arsenic exposure among private well users in Great Plains Indian Nations.
Thomas ED; Gittelsohn J; Yracheta J; Powers M; O'Leary M; Harvey DE; Red Cloud R; Best LG; Black Bear A; Navas-Acien A; George CM
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 650(Pt 2):3120-3133. PubMed ID: 30373089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Associations between private well water and community water supply arsenic concentrations in the conterminous United States.
Spaur M; Lombard MA; Ayotte JD; Harvey DE; Bostick BC; Chillrud SN; Navas-Acien A; Nigra AE
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Sep; 787():147555. PubMed ID: 33991916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction in drinking water arsenic exposure and health risk through arsenic treatment among private well households in Maine and New Jersey, USA.
Yang Q; Flanagan SV; Chillrud S; Ross J; Zeng W; Culbertson C; Spayd S; Backer L; Smith AE; Zheng Y
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 738():139683. PubMed ID: 32535281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial relationship between well water arsenic and uranium in Northern Plains native lands.
Sobel M; Sanchez TR; Zacher T; Mailloux B; Powers M; Yracheta J; Harvey D; Best LG; Bear AB; Hasan K; Thomas E; Morgan C; Aurand D; Ristau S; Olmedo P; Chen R; Rule A; O'Leary M; Navas-Acien A; George CM; Bostick B
Environ Pollut; 2021 Oct; 287():117655. PubMed ID: 34426377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in arsenic exposure in Araihazar, Bangladesh from 2001 through 2015 following a blanket well testing and education campaign.
Huhmann BL; Harvey CF; Navas-Acien A; Graziano J; Parvez F; Chen Y; Argos M; Ahmed A; Hasan AKMR; Ahsan H; van Geen A
Environ Int; 2019 Apr; 125():82-89. PubMed ID: 30710803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of time and point-of-use devices on arsenic levels in Southeastern Michigan drinking water, USA.
Slotnick MJ; Meliker JR; Nriagu JO
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Oct; 369(1-3):42-50. PubMed ID: 16750243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lessons Learned from Arsenic Mitigation among Private Well Households.
Zheng Y
Curr Environ Health Rep; 2017 Sep; 4(3):373-382. PubMed ID: 28741248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting temporal variability of arsenic in groundwater used for drinking water supply in the United States.
Ayotte JD; Belaval M; Olson SA; Burow KR; Flanagan SM; Hinkle SR; Lindsey BD
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Feb; 505():1370-9. PubMed ID: 24650751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Naturally occurring metals in unregulated domestic wells in Nevada, USA.
Arienzo MM; Saftner D; Bacon SN; Robtoy E; Neveux I; Schlauch K; Carbone M; Grzymski J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 851(Pt 2):158277. PubMed ID: 36029812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recommended Sampling Intervals for Arsenic in Private Wells.
Mailloux BJ; Procopio NA; Bakker M; Chen T; Choudhury I; Ahmed KM; Mozumder MRH; Ellis T; Chillrud S; van Geen A
Ground Water; 2021 Jan; 59(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 32483831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. User experience of point-of-use water treatment for private wells in North Carolina: Implications for outreach and well stewardship.
Mulhern R; Grubbs B; Gray K; MacDonald Gibson J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 1):150448. PubMed ID: 34563909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.
Flanagan SV; Spayd SE; Procopio NA; Chillrud SN; Braman S; Zheng Y
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 562():999-1009. PubMed ID: 27118151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arsenic in private well water part 2 of 3: Who benefits the most from traditional testing promotion?
Flanagan SV; Spayd SE; Procopio NA; Chillrud SN; Ross J; Braman S; Zheng Y
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 562():1010-1018. PubMed ID: 27142115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field testing of over 30,000 wells for arsenic across 400 villages of the Punjab plains of Pakistan and India: Implications for prioritizing mitigation.
van Geen A; Farooqi A; Kumar A; Khattak JA; Mushtaq N; Hussain I; Ellis T; Singh CK
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 654():1358-1363. PubMed ID: 30841408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
