These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36410659)

  • 1. Does the Use of a Uterine Manipulator or Intracorporeal Colpotomy Confer an Inferior Prognosis in Minimally Invasive Surgery-Treated Early-stage Cervical Cancer?
    Wang R; Hu Y; Xia H; Zhu X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 36410659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Song YL; Li RZ; Feng BJ; Lu YH; Wang LF; Wang ZY; Pei KG; Sun LF; Li R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 50(4):108240. PubMed ID: 38457858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy with Enclosed Colpotomy and without the Use of Uterine Manipulator for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Yuan P; Liu Z; Qi J; Yang X; Hu T; Tan H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 30802608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection criteria and colpotomic approach for safe minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Kong TW; Son JH; Paek J; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):e7. PubMed ID: 31788997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
    Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoendoscopic Single-site Radical Hysterectomy with Vaginal Closure and without Uterine Manipulator for FIGO IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Chen S; Zheng Y; Tong L; Zhao X; Chen L; Wang Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1471-1472. PubMed ID: 31926301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li RZ; Sun LF; Li R; Wang HJ
    BJOG; 2023 Jan; 130(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 36331008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical Approach and Use of Uterine Manipulator Are Not Associated with LVSI in Surgery for Early-stage Cervical Cancer.
    Liu Y; Huang S; Ming X; Jing H; Li Z
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):1573-1578. PubMed ID: 33497723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transvaginal cervical tumor-concealing no-look no-touch technique in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel operation technique.
    Kanao H; Fusegi A; Omi M; Youssefzadeh AC; Nomura H; Matsuo K
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e27. PubMed ID: 36562133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Klapdor R; Hertel H; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 304(3):577-587. PubMed ID: 34021804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the possible impact of peritoneal tumor exposure amongst women with early stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive approach.
    Pedone Anchora L; Bizzarri N; Kucukmetin A; Turco LC; Gallotta V; Carbone V; Rundle S; Ratnavelu N; Cosentino F; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Fedele C; Gomes N; Ferrandina G; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 47(5):1090-1097. PubMed ID: 33039294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Padilla-Iserte P; Lago V; Tauste C; Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Oliver R; Coronado P; Martín-Salamanca MB; Pantoja-Garrido M; Marcos-Sanmartin J; Gilabert-Estellés J; Lorenzo C; Cazorla E; Roldán-Rivas F; Rodríguez-Hernández JR; Sánchez L; Muruzábal JC; Hervas D; Domingo S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):65.e1-65.e11. PubMed ID: 32693096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic factors influencing pelvic, extra-pelvic, and intraperitoneal recurrences in lymph node-negative early-stage cervical cancer patients following radical hysterectomy.
    Kong TW; Son JH; Paek J; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 252():94-99. PubMed ID: 32590168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Adenocarcinoma after Preoperative Brachytherapy in 10 Steps.
    Colombo PE; Nguyen VH; Taoum C; Mourregot A; Neron M; Kerr C; Rouanet P; Carrier G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1138-1139. PubMed ID: 33031927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.