These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3641161)

  • 1. Anecdotal records improve evaluations.
    Marker CG
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Dec; 17(12):44-6. PubMed ID: 3641161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How evaluations can improve performance.
    DeSimone A
    RN; 1984 Jul; 47(7):15, 17. PubMed ID: 6564689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anecdotal records.
    Craig J
    Can Nurse; 1978 May; 74(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 647643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - part III. Developing performance standards and an evaluation tool for staff nurses.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(5):36-44. PubMed ID: 6924871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating supplemental professional nurses.
    Metzger NJ
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):54-5, 58-9, 62. PubMed ID: 2294495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nursing management in critical care units. Performance appraisal of staff nurses: Part I.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 6918283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
    Cunningham CV
    Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival kit for managers. 8. Staff appraisal and development.
    Pincus J
    Nurs Mirror; 1982 Nov; 155(21):47-9. PubMed ID: 6924342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - Part II. Analyzing the old and planning for the new.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(4):89-90. PubMed ID: 6925523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Staff development and performance review.
    Stewart AM
    Nurs Times; 1978 Apr; 74(16):654-6. PubMed ID: 652530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Policy and procedure manual. Employee anecdotal record.
    Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1987; 9(3):17-8. PubMed ID: 10284117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement technology applications in performance appraisal.
    Stalker MZ; Kornblith AB; Lewis PM; Parker R
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 3633963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance appraisal of CCU nurses.
    Huang SH; Dasher LA; Varner CF
    Nurs Manage; 1981 Oct; 12(10):50-5. PubMed ID: 6913847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of nursing personnel in the hospitals of the Emilia Romagna region].
    Simonini L
    Prof Inferm; 1984; 37(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 6425839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The head nurse and the difficulties of personnel evaluation].
    Lanctôt L
    Infirm Can; 1979 Jun; 21(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 255446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Is that ward report finished yet"?
    McDonald E
    N Z Nurs J; 1985 Feb; 78(2):3-4. PubMed ID: 3856777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual performance review--meeting staff needs.
    Atkins C; Haigh C
    Br J Theatre Nurs; 1992 Dec; 2(9):18-20. PubMed ID: 1288749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying quality.
    Pullan B; Chittock J
    Nurs Times; 1986 Jan 1-7; 82(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 3633094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.