These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36411805)

  • 1. Gender differences in lower facial soft tissue thickness among different skeletal patterns, based on soft tissue cephalometric analysis.
    Alhumadi A; Al-Khafaji TJ; Hussein Alyassiri AM; Alhamadi WW
    J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():54. PubMed ID: 36411805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Male and Female Characteristics of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Different Orthodontic Malocclusions Evaluated by Cephalometric Radiography.
    Perović T; Blažej Z
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 May; 24():3415-3424. PubMed ID: 29791323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation Between Sex and Facial Soft Tissue Characteristics Among Young Saudi Patients with Various Orthodontic Skeletal Malocclusions.
    Ajwa N; Alkhars FA; AlMubarak FH; Aldajani H; AlAli NM; Alhanabbi AH; Alsulaiman SA; Divakar DD
    Med Sci Monit; 2020 Feb; 26():e919771. PubMed ID: 32101535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of soft tissue thickness in persons with malocclusions of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2].
    Tanić T; Blažej Z; Mitić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2012; 140(7-8):412-8. PubMed ID: 23092023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial soft tissue thickness among skeletal malocclusions: is there a difference?
    Kamak H; Celikoglu M
    Korean J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 42(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 23112928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Facial Soft Tissue Dimensions in Adult Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Classes using Cone beam Computed Tomography.
    Jazmati HM; Ajaj MA; Hajeer MY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 27595719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cephalometric analysis of the soft tissue profile in Hunan Han adults with normal occlusion].
    Zhou S; Ou P; Yu M; Guo X; Shao C; He L; Su H
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Apr; 40(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 25931229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Retrospective Study Comparing Nose, Lip, and Chin Morphology in Class I, Class II, and Class III Skeletal Relationships in Patients Visiting to the Department of Orthodontics, BPKIHS: A Cephalometric Study.
    Chaudhary A; Giri J; Gyawali R; Pokharel PR
    Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():2252746. PubMed ID: 36046694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy.
    Gjørup H; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):312-23. PubMed ID: 1927981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 8540481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The effectiveness of asymmetric extraction in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions].
    Chen W; Chen RJ; Pan XG; Yu Q; Hu Z; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Aug; 19(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 20871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between malocclusion, soft tissue profile, and pharyngeal airways: A cephalometric study.
    Lopatienė K; Šidlauskas A; Vasiliauskas A; Čečytė L; Švalkauskienė V; Šidlauskas M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2016; 52(5):307-314. PubMed ID: 27816426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [
    Zhou ZJ; Chen Y; Lin YJ; Sun YT; Wang TG; Mao LX; Liu JQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 34645237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Influence of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions on the Harmony of the Human Face Profile.
    Perović T
    Med Sci Monit; 2017 Nov; 23():5589-5598. PubMed ID: 29170363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Soft tissue thickness of face profile conditioning by dento-skeletal anomalies].
    Tanić T; Blažej Z; Mitić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2011; 139(7-8):439-45. PubMed ID: 21980651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Similar are the Dentoskeletal Characteristics of Class III Double-Jaw Surgery Patients with Ideal Post-Treatment Profiles and Class I Subjects?
    Tunçer Nİ; İnce Bingöl S
    Turk J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 36(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 36967606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study.
    Patil HS; Golwalkar S; Chougule K; Kulkarni NR
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2021 Feb; 63(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 33650399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.