These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36412164)

  • 1. Dual attention guided multiscale neural network trained with curriculum learning for noninvasive prediction of Gleason Grade Group from MRI.
    Hu J; Shen A; Qiao X; Zhou Z; Qian X; Zheng Y; Bao J; Wang X; Dai Y
    Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2279-2289. PubMed ID: 36412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep Learning Regression for Prostate Cancer Detection and Grading in Bi-Parametric MRI.
    Vente C; Vos P; Hosseinzadeh M; Pluim J; Veta M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 68(2):374-383. PubMed ID: 32396068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI-based prostate cancer classification using 3D efficient capsule network.
    Li Y; Wynne J; Wang J; Roper J; Chang CW; Patel AB; Shelton J; Liu T; Mao H; Yang X
    Med Phys; 2024 Jul; 51(7):4748-4758. PubMed ID: 38346111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Accuracy and Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Targeted and Template Systematic Prostate Biopsy Based on Bi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Noh TI; Tae JH; Kim HK; Shim JS; Kang SG; Sung DJ; Cheon J; Lee JG; Kang SH
    Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jul; 52(3):714-721. PubMed ID: 32054151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided classification of prostate cancer grade groups from MRI images using texture features and stacked sparse autoencoder.
    Abraham B; Nair MS
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Nov; 69():60-68. PubMed ID: 30205334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative Predictive Value of Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Significant Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Data Analysis Based on Clinical Data from Four Prospective, Registered Studies.
    Knaapila J; Jambor I; Ettala O; Taimen P; Verho J; Perez IM; Kiviniemi A; Pahikkala T; Merisaari H; Lamminen T; Saunavaara J; Aronen HJ; Syvänen KT; Boström PJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 May; 7(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32418878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ProstAttention-Net: A deep attention model for prostate cancer segmentation by aggressiveness in MRI scans.
    Duran A; Dussert G; Rouvière O; Jaouen T; Jodoin PM; Lartizien C
    Med Image Anal; 2022 Apr; 77():102347. PubMed ID: 35085952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (IMPROD Trial): Sensitivity for prostate cancer detection in correlation with whole-mount prostatectomy sections and implications for focal therapy.
    Merisaari H; Jambor I; Ettala O; Boström PJ; Montoya Perez I; Verho J; Kiviniemi A; Syvänen K; Kähkönen E; Eklund L; Pahikkala T; Vainio P; Saunavaara J; Aronen HJ; Taimen P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1641-1650. PubMed ID: 30903647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A predictive model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters for improved risk assessment and selection of biopsy-naïve men for prostate biopsies.
    Boesen L; Thomsen FB; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thomsen HS; Jakobsen H
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 30988407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noninvasive Prediction of High-Grade Prostate Cancer via Biparametric MRI Radiomics.
    Gong L; Xu M; Fang M; Zou J; Yang S; Yu X; Xu D; Zhou L; Li H; He B; Wang Y; Fang X; Dong D; Tian J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Oct; 52(4):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 32212356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SSPT-bpMRI: A Self-supervised Pre-training Scheme for Improving Prostate Cancer Detection and Diagnosis in Bi-parametric MRI
    Yuan Y; Ahn E; Feng D; Khadra M; Kim J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonographic pathological grading of prostate cancer using automatic region-based Gleason grading network.
    Lu X; Zhang S; Liu Z; Liu S; Huang J; Kong G; Li M; Liang Y; Cui Y; Yang C; Zhao S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2022 Dec; 102():102125. PubMed ID: 36257091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: Preliminary findings.
    Shiradkar R; Ghose S; Jambor I; Taimen P; Ettala O; Purysko AS; Madabhushi A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1626-1636. PubMed ID: 29734484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-throughput precision MRI assessment with integrated stack-ensemble deep learning can enhance the preoperative prediction of prostate cancer Gleason grade.
    Bao J; Hou Y; Qin L; Zhi R; Wang XM; Shi HB; Sun HZ; Hu CH; Zhang YD
    Br J Cancer; 2023 Mar; 128(7):1267-1277. PubMed ID: 36646808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Biparametric Prostate MRI, Radiomics, and Kallikreins: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of Men With a Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Montoya Perez I; Merisaari H; Jambor I; Ettala O; Taimen P; Knaapila J; Kekki H; Khan FL; Syrjälä E; Steiner A; Syvänen KT; Verho J; Seppänen M; Rannikko A; Riikonen J; Mirtti T; Lamminen T; Saunavaara J; Falagario U; Martini A; Pahikkala T; Pettersson K; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Feb; 55(2):465-477. PubMed ID: 34227169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-retest repeatability of a deep learning architecture in detecting and segmenting clinically significant prostate cancer on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps.
    Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Merisaari H; Prasanna P; Ettala O; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Boström PJ; Jambor I; Madabhushi A
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):379-391. PubMed ID: 32700021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.