125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36412164)
1. Dual attention guided multiscale neural network trained with curriculum learning for noninvasive prediction of Gleason Grade Group from MRI.
Hu J; Shen A; Qiao X; Zhou Z; Qian X; Zheng Y; Bao J; Wang X; Dai Y
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2279-2289. PubMed ID: 36412164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deep Learning Regression for Prostate Cancer Detection and Grading in Bi-Parametric MRI.
Vente C; Vos P; Hosseinzadeh M; Pluim J; Veta M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 68(2):374-383. PubMed ID: 32396068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy and Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Targeted and Template Systematic Prostate Biopsy Based on Bi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Noh TI; Tae JH; Kim HK; Shim JS; Kang SG; Sung DJ; Cheon J; Lee JG; Kang SH
Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jul; 52(3):714-721. PubMed ID: 32054151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided classification of prostate cancer grade groups from MRI images using texture features and stacked sparse autoencoder.
Abraham B; Nair MS
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Nov; 69():60-68. PubMed ID: 30205334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Negative Predictive Value of Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Significant Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Data Analysis Based on Clinical Data from Four Prospective, Registered Studies.
Knaapila J; Jambor I; Ettala O; Taimen P; Verho J; Perez IM; Kiviniemi A; Pahikkala T; Merisaari H; Lamminen T; Saunavaara J; Aronen HJ; Syvänen KT; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 May; 7(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32418878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ProstAttention-Net: A deep attention model for prostate cancer segmentation by aggressiveness in MRI scans.
Duran A; Dussert G; Rouvière O; Jaouen T; Jodoin PM; Lartizien C
Med Image Anal; 2022 Apr; 77():102347. PubMed ID: 35085952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (IMPROD Trial): Sensitivity for prostate cancer detection in correlation with whole-mount prostatectomy sections and implications for focal therapy.
Merisaari H; Jambor I; Ettala O; Boström PJ; Montoya Perez I; Verho J; Kiviniemi A; Syvänen K; Kähkönen E; Eklund L; Pahikkala T; Vainio P; Saunavaara J; Aronen HJ; Taimen P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1641-1650. PubMed ID: 30903647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Xu L; Zhang G; Shi B; Liu Y; Zou T; Yan W; Xiao Y; Xue H; Feng F; Lei J; Jin Z; Sun H
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 31864408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A predictive model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters for improved risk assessment and selection of biopsy-naïve men for prostate biopsies.
Boesen L; Thomsen FB; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thomsen HS; Jakobsen H
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 30988407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noninvasive Prediction of High-Grade Prostate Cancer via Biparametric MRI Radiomics.
Gong L; Xu M; Fang M; Zou J; Yang S; Yu X; Xu D; Zhou L; Li H; He B; Wang Y; Fang X; Dong D; Tian J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Oct; 52(4):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 32212356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SSPT-bpMRI: A Self-supervised Pre-training Scheme for Improving Prostate Cancer Detection and Diagnosis in Bi-parametric MRI
Yuan Y; Ahn E; Feng D; Khadra M; Kim J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonographic pathological grading of prostate cancer using automatic region-based Gleason grading network.
Lu X; Zhang S; Liu Z; Liu S; Huang J; Kong G; Li M; Liang Y; Cui Y; Yang C; Zhao S
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2022 Dec; 102():102125. PubMed ID: 36257091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: Preliminary findings.
Shiradkar R; Ghose S; Jambor I; Taimen P; Ettala O; Purysko AS; Madabhushi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1626-1636. PubMed ID: 29734484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-throughput precision MRI assessment with integrated stack-ensemble deep learning can enhance the preoperative prediction of prostate cancer Gleason grade.
Bao J; Hou Y; Qin L; Zhi R; Wang XM; Shi HB; Sun HZ; Hu CH; Zhang YD
Br J Cancer; 2023 Mar; 128(7):1267-1277. PubMed ID: 36646808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Biparametric Prostate MRI, Radiomics, and Kallikreins: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of Men With a Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Montoya Perez I; Merisaari H; Jambor I; Ettala O; Taimen P; Knaapila J; Kekki H; Khan FL; Syrjälä E; Steiner A; Syvänen KT; Verho J; Seppänen M; Rannikko A; Riikonen J; Mirtti T; Lamminen T; Saunavaara J; Falagario U; Martini A; Pahikkala T; Pettersson K; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Feb; 55(2):465-477. PubMed ID: 34227169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Test-retest repeatability of a deep learning architecture in detecting and segmenting clinically significant prostate cancer on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps.
Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Merisaari H; Prasanna P; Ettala O; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Boström PJ; Jambor I; Madabhushi A
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):379-391. PubMed ID: 32700021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
