These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36412545)

  • 1. Natural History of Degenerative Hip Abductor Tendon Lesions.
    Schenk P; Dimitriou D; Rahm S; Zimmermann SM; Finsterwald M; Higashigaito K; Sutter R; Zingg PO
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Jan; 51(1):160-168. PubMed ID: 36412545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence of Contralateral Hip Abductor Tears and Factors Associated With Symptomatic Progression.
    Arvesen J; McCallum J; Pill SG; Cannady H; Adams KJ; Jackson I; Wienke JR; Folk J
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 May; 50(6):1603-1608. PubMed ID: 35507471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hip abductor tendon pathology visualized by 1.5 versus 3. 0 Tesla MRIs.
    Oehler N; Ruby JK; Strahl A; Maas R; Ruether W; Niemeier A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Feb; 140(2):145-153. PubMed ID: 31243547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of MRI findings with clinical findings of trochanteric pain syndrome.
    Blankenbaker DG; Ullrick SR; Davis KW; De Smet AA; Haaland B; Fine JP
    Skeletal Radiol; 2008 Oct; 37(10):903-9. PubMed ID: 18566811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tendinosis and tears of gluteus medius and minimus muscles as a cause of hip pain: MR imaging findings.
    Kingzett-Taylor A; Tirman PF; Feller J; McGann W; Prieto V; Wischer T; Cameron JA; Cvitanic O; Genant HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):1123-6. PubMed ID: 10511191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pertrochanteric Calcifications in Patients With Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Description, Prevalence, and Correlation With Intraoperatively Diagnosed Hip Abductor Tendon Injuries.
    Rosinsky PJ; Yelton MJ; Ankem HK; Meghpara MB; Maldonado DR; Shapira J; Yelton BR; Lall AC; Domb BG
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Jun; 49(7):1759-1768. PubMed ID: 33956532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association of Preoperative Gluteal Muscle Fatty Infiltration With Patient Outcomes in Women After Hip Abductor Tendon Repair Augmented With LARS.
    Ebert JR; Smith A; Breidahl W; Fallon M; Janes GC
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Nov; 47(13):3148-3157. PubMed ID: 31513430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Degenerative rupture of the hip abductors. Missed diagnosis with therapy-resistant trochanteric pain of the hips and positive Trendelenburg sign in elderly patients].
    Aepli-Schneider N; Treumann T; Müller U; Schmid L
    Z Rheumatol; 2012 Jan; 71(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 22286357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence and pattern of gluteus medius and minimus tendon pathology and muscle atrophy in older individuals using MRI.
    Chi AS; Long SS; Zoga AC; Read PJ; Deely DM; Parker L; Morrison WB
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Dec; 44(12):1727-33. PubMed ID: 26260535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pathogenesis and contemporary diagnoses for lateral hip pain: a scoping review.
    Sunil Kumar KH; Rawal J; Nakano N; Sarmento A; Khanduja V
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Aug; 29(8):2408-2416. PubMed ID: 33341914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hip Abductor and Peritrochanteric Space Conditions.
    Weber AE; Bell JA; Bolia IK
    Clin Sports Med; 2021 Apr; 40(2):311-322. PubMed ID: 33673889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic treatment of gluteus medius tendon tear.
    Thaunat M; Pacoret V; Saad M; Saint-Etienne A; Morvan A;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Dec; 108(8S):103393. PubMed ID: 36075568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of Open Versus Endoscopic Repair of Abductor Muscle Tears of the Hip: A Systematic Review.
    Chandrasekaran S; Lodhia P; Gui C; Vemula SP; Martin TJ; Domb BG
    Arthroscopy; 2015 Oct; 31(10):2057-67.e2. PubMed ID: 26033462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateral hip pain: does imaging predict response to localized injection?
    Walker P; Kannangara S; Bruce WJ; Michael D; Van der Wall H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Apr; 457():144-9. PubMed ID: 17194957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A roadmap to develop clinical guidelines for open surgery of acute and chronic tears of hip abductor tendons.
    Kenanidis E; Lund B; Christofilopoulos P
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 May; 29(5):1420-1431. PubMed ID: 33079258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and physical examination findings in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome.
    Bird PA; Oakley SP; Shnier R; Kirkham BW
    Arthritis Rheum; 2001 Sep; 44(9):2138-45. PubMed ID: 11592379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The outcome of endoscopy for recalcitrant greater trochanteric pain syndrome.
    Drummond J; Fary C; Tran P
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Nov; 136(11):1547-1554. PubMed ID: 27405492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Fatty Infiltration on Hip Abductor Repair Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Looney AM; Bodendorfer BM; Donaldson ST; Browning RB; Chahla JA; Nho SJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Jul; 50(9):2568-2580. PubMed ID: 34495797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRI and US of gluteal tendinopathy in greater trochanteric pain syndrome.
    Kong A; Van der Vliet A; Zadow S
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1772-83. PubMed ID: 17149624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonographic pathoanatomy of greater trochanteric pain syndrome.
    Atilano L; Martin N; Iglesias G; Martin JI; Mendiola J; Aiyegbusi A; Bully P; Rodriguez-Palomo M; Andia I
    J Ultrasound; 2024 Sep; 27(3):501-510. PubMed ID: 38082193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.