135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36412571)
1. Diagnostic Performance of the Newly Developed WellPrep® Liquid-Based Cytology System and Its Comparison with SurePathTM in Cervical Squamous Lesions.
Choi JE; Jin MS; Nikas IP; Ryu HS
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 36412571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of HIV mRNA in routine liquid-based cytology specimens of HIV-infected women.
Brito MJ; Quintas A; Sequeira P; Alves AT; Martins C; Félix A
Cytopathology; 2021 Sep; 32(5):640-645. PubMed ID: 33914385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing: a pooled analysis using the data from 13 population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.
Pan QJ; Hu SY; Guo HQ; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Chen W; Cao J; Jiang Y; Zhao FH; Qiao YL
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24631450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The reporting rates of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and their human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up results: A comparison between ThinPrep and SurePath preparations.
Sinclair WD; Gibbons-Fideler IS; Shen R; Li Z
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):959-963. PubMed ID: 33991062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introduction of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening in Luxembourg.
Latsuzbaia A; Hebette G; Fischer M; Arbyn M; Weyers S; Vielh P; Schmitt F; Mossong J
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 May; 45(5):384-390. PubMed ID: 28247516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.
Koliopoulos G; Nyaga VN; Santesso N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Paraskevaidis E; Arbyn M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD008587. PubMed ID: 28796882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for detection of uterine cervical lesions: a prospective observational study.
Nishio H; Iwata T; Nomura H; Morisada T; Takeshima N; Takano H; Sasaki H; Nakatani E; Teramukai S; Aoki D
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 48(6):522-528. PubMed ID: 29668969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Efficacy in Abnormal Cervical Cell Detection between Liquid-based Cytology and Conventional Cytology.
Tanabodee J; Thepsuwan K; Karalak A; Laoaree O; Krachang A; Manmatt K; Anontwatanawong N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(16):7381-4. PubMed ID: 26514540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Unsatisfactory Rates and Detection of Abnormal Cervical Cytology Between Conventional Papanicolaou Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology (Sure Path®).
Kituncharoen S; Tantbirojn P; Niruthisard S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8491-4. PubMed ID: 26745107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liquid-based cytology for the detection of cervical intraepithelial lesions in Jimma town, Ethiopia.
Tesfaw G; Ahmed Y; Gedefaw L; Dube L; Godu S; Eshetu K; Nigussie M; Hailekiros H; Joloba M; Goba G; Abdissa A
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jul; 20(1):706. PubMed ID: 32727507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
Cox JT
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between Conventional Cytology and Liquid-Based Cytology in the Tertiary Brazilian Navy Hospital in Rio de Janeiro.
de Oliveira ACA; Domingues MF; Neufeld PM; Fleury M; Nogueira Neto JF
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(6):539-546. PubMed ID: 32516778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pooled analysis of the performance of liquid-based cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China.
Pan QJ; Hu SY; Zhang X; Ci PW; Zhang WH; Guo HQ; Cao J; Zhao FH; Lytwyn A; Qiao YL
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Sep; 121(9):473-82. PubMed ID: 23907807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cytopathological changes in pregnancy: An experience from a low resource setting.
Rasheed FA; Yakasai IA; Takai IU; Yusuf I; Ibrahim UM
Ann Afr Med; 2021; 20(3):212-221. PubMed ID: 34558451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a single center report concerning over 100,000 samples.
Sangkarat S; Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Chaopotong P; Benjapibal M; Wongtiraporn W; Laiwejpithaya S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(5):2051-5. PubMed ID: 24716933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomised comparison of SurePath liquid-based cytology and conventional smear cytology in a colposcopy clinic setting.
Sykes PH; Harker DY; Miller A; Whitehead M; Neal H; Wells JE; Peddie D
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1375-81. PubMed ID: 18823488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].
Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
