149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36412873)
1. TEGDMA-Functionalized Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate Resin-Based Composites Prevent Secondary Caries in an In Vitro Biofilm Model.
Ionescu AC; Hahnel S; Chiari MDS; König A; Delvecchio P; Braga RR; Zambelli V; Brambilla E
J Funct Biomater; 2022 Nov; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36412873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbiological models for accelerated development of secondary caries in vitro.
Ionescu AC; Hahnel S; Delvecchio P; Ilie N; Moldovan M; Zambelli V; Bellani G; Brambilla E
J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104333. PubMed ID: 36257513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Secondary caries formation with a two-species biofilm artificial mouth.
Amend S; Frankenberger R; Lücker S; Domann E; Krämer N
Dent Mater; 2018 May; 34(5):786-796. PubMed ID: 29544984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glass ionomer cement inhibits secondary caries in an in vitro biofilm model.
Krämer N; Schmidt M; Lücker S; Domann E; Frankenberger R
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):1019-1031. PubMed ID: 28741172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Streptococcus mutans adherence and biofilm formation on experimental composites containing dicalcium phosphate dihydrate nanoparticles.
Ionescu AC; Hahnel S; Cazzaniga G; Ottobelli M; Braga RR; Rodrigues MC; Brambilla E
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2017 Jul; 28(7):108. PubMed ID: 28540581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro remineralization of artificial enamel caries with resin composites containing calcium phosphate particles.
Alania Y; Natale LC; Nesadal D; Vilela H; Magalhães AC; Braga RR
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Jul; 107(5):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 30296360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of tooth demineralization and interfacial bacterial penetration around resin composites containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler.
Zhou Y; Hiraishi N; Shimada Y; Wang G; Tagami J; Feng X
Dent Mater; 2021 May; 37(5):849-862. PubMed ID: 33674077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioactive composites containing TEGDMA-functionalized calcium phosphate particles: Degree of conversion, fracture strength and ion release evaluation.
Alania Y; Chiari MD; Rodrigues MC; Arana-Chavez VE; Bressiani AH; Vichi FM; Braga RR
Dent Mater; 2016 Dec; 32(12):e374-e381. PubMed ID: 27665147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of matrix and filler fraction on biofilm formation on the surface of experimental resin-based composites.
Ionescu A; Brambilla E; Wastl DS; Giessibl FJ; Cazzaniga G; Schneider-Feyrer S; Hahnel S
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Jan; 26(1):5372. PubMed ID: 25604698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro evaluation of secondary caries development in enamel and root dentin around luted metallic restoration.
Shinkai RS; Cury AA; Cury JA
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11203778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Bioactive Composites on Microhardness of Enamel Exposed to Carious Challenge.
Pinto MFC; Alania Y; Natale LC; Magalhães AC; Braga RR
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Aug; 26(3):122-128. PubMed ID: 30063306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.
Koc Vural U; Kerimova L; Kiremitci A
Odontology; 2021 Apr; 109(2):376-384. PubMed ID: 32902766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.
Khvostenko D; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 26621028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo vs in vitro anticariogenic behavior of glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Eliades G
Dent Mater; 2002 Dec; 18(8):561-9. PubMed ID: 12385896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical characterization and ion release of bioactive dental composites containing calcium phosphate particles.
Natale LC; Rodrigues MC; Alania Y; Chiari MDS; Boaro LCC; Cotrim M; Vega O; Braga RR
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Aug; 84():161-167. PubMed ID: 29783203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of biofilm exposure on marginal integrity of composite restorations.
Mushashe AM; de Almeida SA; Ferracane JL; Merritt J; Correr GM
Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):201-205. PubMed ID: 32794395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microbiological or chemical models of enamel secondary caries compared by polarized-light microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.
Paradella TC; de Sousa FA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Aug; 90(2):635-40. PubMed ID: 19204918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Finishing Techniques on the Marginal Integrity of Resin-Based Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restoration.
Delgado AJ; Ritter AV; Donovan TE; Ziemiecki T; Heymann HO
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2015; 27(4):184-93. PubMed ID: 26177046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
