These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36413429)

  • 1. Designing electronic graphic symbol-based AAC systems: a scoping review. Part 2: application of human-centred design.
    Tönsing K; Bartram J; Morwane RE; Waller A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 36413429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designing electronic graphic symbol-based AAC systems: a scoping review. Part 1: system description.
    Tönsing KM; Bartram J; Morwane RE; Waller A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):1079-1091. PubMed ID: 36417262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The language and communication attributes of graphic symbol communication aids - a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
    Judge S; Randall N; Goldbart J; Lynch Y; Moulam L; Meredith S; Murray J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Aug; 15(6):652-662. PubMed ID: 31012746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strategies in construction and interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems.
    Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP; Côté-Giroux P; Pauzé AM; Vallée V
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Dec; 26(4):299-312. PubMed ID: 21091304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning graphic symbols in two languages: Effects of monolingual teaching.
    Tönsing KM; Dada S
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2023 Apr; 25(2):281-291. PubMed ID: 37139671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the learnability and retention between Blissymbols and CyberGlyphs.
    Alant E; Life H; Harty M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2005; 40(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 16101272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two approaches for representing AAC vocabulary for young children.
    Worah S; McNaughton D; Light J; Benedek-Wood E
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2015; 17(5):460-9. PubMed ID: 25592055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards E-textiles in augmentative and alternative communication - user scenarios developed by speech and language therapists.
    Vihriälä TA; Raisamo R; Ihalainen T; Virkki J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1626-1636. PubMed ID: 37402238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attributes of communication aids as described by those supporting children and young people with AAC.
    Judge S; Murray J; Lynch Y; Meredith S; Moulam L; Randall N; Whittle H; Goldbart J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 May; 58(3):910-928. PubMed ID: 36565242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Models and frameworks for guiding assessment for aided Augmentative and Alternative communication (AAC): a scoping review.
    Burnham SPL; Finak P; Henderson JT; Gaurav N; Batorowicz B; Pinder SD; Davies TC
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1758-1772. PubMed ID: 37435920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of developmental changes in interpretation and construction of graphic AAC symbol sequences through systematic combination of input and output modalities.
    Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP
    Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Sep; 30(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 25109228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expressive and receptive performance with graphic symbol sentences by individuals who use aided communication.
    Sutton A; Trudeau N; Morford JP; Smith MM; Mascolo MÈ
    Augment Altern Commun; 2022 Sep; 38(3):135-147. PubMed ID: 35726671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reflections on Building a Multi-Country AAC Implementation Guide.
    Draffan EA; Danger C; Banes D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 Aug; 306():181-187. PubMed ID: 37638914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and development of an AAC app based on a speech-to-symbol technology.
    Radici E; Bonacina S; De Leo G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2574-2577. PubMed ID: 28268848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids.
    Judge S; Townend G
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(4):366-81. PubMed ID: 23889833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'We were just kind of handed it and then it was smoke bombed by everyone': How do external stakeholders contribute to parent rejection and the abandonment of AAC systems?
    Moorcroft A; Scarinci N; Meyer C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2020 Jan; 55(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 31553126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Democratisation of AAC Symbol Choices Using Technology.
    Draffan EA; Wald M; Zeinoun N; Banes D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():355-362. PubMed ID: 28873823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of environmental sounds on the guessability of animated graphic symbols.
    Harmon AC; Schlosser RW; Gygi B; Shane HC; Kong YY; Book L; Macduff K; Hearn E
    Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Dec; 30(4):298-313. PubMed ID: 25384797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with complex needs: A scoping review.
    Richlin BC; Chow K; Cosetti MK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Aug; 171():111610. PubMed ID: 37329701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Telling tales: unlocking the potential of AAC technologies.
    Waller A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2019 Mar; 54(2):159-169. PubMed ID: 30597706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.