These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36414871)

  • 1. Multidisciplinary perceptions on robotic surgical training: the robot is a stimulus for surgical education change.
    Jogerst KM; Coe TM; Petrusa E; Neil J; Davila V; Pearson D; Phitayakorn R; Gee D
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2688-2697. PubMed ID: 36414871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time to consider integration of a formal robotic-assisted surgical training program into obstetrics/gynecology residency curricula.
    Vetter MH; Palettas M; Hade E; Fowler J; Salani R
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):517-521. PubMed ID: 29285654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity and reliability of the robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills.
    Siddiqui NY; Galloway ML; Geller EJ; Green IC; Hur HC; Langston K; Pitter MC; Tarr ME; Martino MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1193-1199. PubMed ID: 24807319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts.
    Ahmed K; Khan R; Mottrie A; Lovegrove C; Abaza R; Ahlawat R; Ahlering T; Ahlgren G; Artibani W; Barret E; Cathelineau X; Challacombe B; Coloby P; Khan MS; Hubert J; Michel MS; Montorsi F; Murphy D; Palou J; Patel V; Piechaud PT; Van Poppel H; Rischmann P; Sanchez-Salas R; Siemer S; Stoeckle M; Stolzenburg JU; Terrier JE; Thüroff JW; Vaessen C; Van Der Poel HG; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Volpe A; Wagner C; Wiklund P; Wilson T; Wirth M; Witt J; Dasgupta P
    BJU Int; 2015 Jul; 116(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 25359658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic simulation training for urological trainees: a comprehensive review on cost, merits and challenges.
    MacCraith E; Forde JC; Davis NF
    J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):371-377. PubMed ID: 30796671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diffusion of Robotic Technology Into Urologic Practice has Led to Improved Resident Physician Robotic Skills.
    Schommer E; Patel VR; Mouraviev V; Thomas C; Thiel DD
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27488814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective assessment in residency-based training for transoral robotic surgery.
    Curry M; Malpani A; Li R; Tantillo T; Jog A; Blanco R; Ha PK; Califano J; Kumar R; Richmon J
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Oct; 122(10):2184-92. PubMed ID: 22915265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating Robotic Technology Into Resident Training: Challenges and Recommendations From the Front Lines.
    Green CA; Mahuron KM; Harris HW; O'Sullivan PS
    Acad Med; 2019 Oct; 94(10):1532-1538. PubMed ID: 30998574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Training in urological robotic surgery. Future perspectives.
    El Sherbiny A; Eissa A; Ghaith A; Morini E; Marzotta L; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Bianchi G; Rocco B
    Arch Esp Urol; 2018 Jan; 71(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 29336338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Multi-Institutional Needs Assessment in the Development of a Robotic Surgery Curriculum: Perceptions From Resident and Faculty Surgeons.
    Imai T; Amersi F; Tillou A; Chau V; Soukiasian H; Lin M
    J Surg Educ; 2023 Jan; 80(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 36075804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of robotic simulation by trainees in residency programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association.
    Thiel DD; Patel VR; Larson T; Lannen A; Leveillee RJ
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 24016366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. General surgery residents' perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training.
    Farivar BS; Flannagan M; Leitman IM
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 25451717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The robotic surgeon training].
    Crestani A; Rossanese M; Abbinante M; Calandriello M; Kungulli A; Giannarini G; Ficarra V
    Urologia; 2015 Oct; 82 Suppl 1():S1-4. PubMed ID: 26429392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structured and Modular Training Pathway for Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP): Validation of the RARP Assessment Score and Learning Curve Assessment.
    Lovegrove C; Novara G; Mottrie A; Guru KA; Brown M; Challacombe B; Popert R; Raza J; Van der Poel H; Peabody J; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 26585582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single Session of Robotic Human Cadaver Training: The Immediate Impact on Urology Residents in a Teaching Hospital.
    Bertolo R; Garisto J; Dagenais J; Sagalovich D; Kaouk JH
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Oct; 28(10):1157-1162. PubMed ID: 29708828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing a Robotic General Surgery Training Curriculum: Identifying Key Elements Through a Delphi Process.
    S Schmiederer I; Torices-Dardon A; M Ferrari-Light D; Charbel Abboud E; Villani V; N Lau J; M Foglia C
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):e129-e136. PubMed ID: 34456170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit.
    Arain NA; Dulan G; Hogg DC; Rege RV; Powers CE; Tesfay ST; Hynan LS; Scott DJ
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Oct; 26(10):2740-5. PubMed ID: 22538678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) Pilot Curriculum for robot assisted gynecological surgery.
    Rusch P; Kimmig R; Lecuru F; Persson J; Ponce J; Degueldre M; Verheijen R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):415-420. PubMed ID: 29236172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
    Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules.
    Mouraviev V; Klein M; Schommer E; Thiel DD; Samavedi S; Kumar A; Leveillee RJ; Thomas R; Pow-Sang JM; Su LM; Mui E; Smith R; Patel V
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Mar; 10(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 26753619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.