These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36415568)

  • 1. Automatic search intervals for the smoothing parameter in penalized splines.
    Li Z; Cao J
    Stat Comput; 2023; 33(1):1. PubMed ID: 36415568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Penalized spline estimation for functional coefficient regression models.
    Cao Y; Lin H; Wu TZ; Yu Y
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2010 Apr; 54(4):891-905. PubMed ID: 21516260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing Smoothing Techniques for Fitting the Nonlinear Effect of Covariate in Cox Models.
    Roshani D; Ghaderi E
    Acta Inform Med; 2016 Feb; 24(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 27041809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variable selection using a smooth information criterion for distributional regression models.
    O'Neill M; Burke K
    Stat Comput; 2023; 33(3):71. PubMed ID: 37155560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Smoothing splines approximation using Hilbert curve basis selection.
    Meng C; Yu J; Chen Y; Zhong W; Ma P
    J Comput Graph Stat; 2022; 31(3):802-812. PubMed ID: 36407675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smoothness selection for penalized quantile regression splines.
    Reiss PT; Huang L
    Int J Biostat; 2012 May; 8(1):Article 10. PubMed ID: 22628358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A note on a nonparametric regression test through penalized splines.
    Chen H; Wang Y; Li R; Shear K
    Stat Sin; 2014; 24():1143-1160. PubMed ID: 25076817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of smoothing methods for determining of the effecting factors on the survival rate of gastric cancer patients.
    Noorkojuri H; Hajizadeh E; Baghestani A; Pourhoseingholi M
    Iran Red Crescent Med J; 2013 Feb; 15(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 23682331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Automatic Baseline Correction Method Based on the Penalized Least Squares Method.
    Zhang F; Tang X; Tong A; Wang B; Wang J
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(7):. PubMed ID: 32260258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More efficient approximation of smoothing splines via space-filling basis selection.
    Meng C; Zhang X; Zhang J; Zhong W; Ma P
    Biometrika; 2020 Sep; 107(3):723-735. PubMed ID: 32831354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Penalized spline smoothing using Kaplan-Meier weights with censored data.
    Orbe J; Virto J
    Biom J; 2018 Sep; 60(5):947-961. PubMed ID: 29943440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Penalized likelihood estimation of the proportional hazards model for survival data with interval censoring.
    Ma J; Couturier DL; Heritier S; Marschner IC
    Int J Biostat; 2022 Nov; 18(2):553-575. PubMed ID: 34714982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing measures of model selection for penalized splines in Cox models.
    Malloy EJ; Spiegelman D; Eisen EA
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2009 May; 53(7):2605-2616. PubMed ID: 20161167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated spectral smoothing with spatially adaptive penalized least squares.
    Urbas AA; Choquette SJ
    Appl Spectrosc; 2011 Jun; 65(6):665-77. PubMed ID: 21639989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Penalized likelihood estimation of a trivariate additive probit model.
    Filippou P; Marra G; Radice R
    Biostatistics; 2017 Jul; 18(3):569-585. PubMed ID: 28334261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved nonparametric penalized maximum likelihood estimation for arbitrarily censored survival data.
    Tubbs JD; Chen LG; Thach TQ; Sham PC
    Stat Med; 2022 Sep; 41(20):4006-4021. PubMed ID: 35750329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Method for Choosing the Smoothing Parameter in a Semi-parametric Model for Detecting Change-points in Blood Flow.
    Han SW; Mesquita RC; Busch TM; Putt ME
    J Appl Stat; 2014; 41(1):26-45. PubMed ID: 24459325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival data analysis with time-dependent covariates using generalized additive models.
    Tsujitani M; Tanaka Y; Sakon M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():986176. PubMed ID: 22545065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic smoothing parameter selection in GAMLSS with an application to centile estimation.
    Rigby RA; Stasinopoulos DM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2014 Aug; 23(4):318-32. PubMed ID: 23376962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Penalized smoothing splines resolve the curvature identifiability problem in age-period-cohort models with unequal intervals.
    Gascoigne C; Smith T
    Stat Med; 2023 May; 42(12):1888-1908. PubMed ID: 36907568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.