These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36415870)

  • 1. Forager-mediated cascading effects on food resource species diversity.
    Ferreira CM; Dammhahn M; Eccard JA
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e9523. PubMed ID: 36415870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. So many choices, so little time: Food preference and movement vary with the landscape of fear.
    Ferreira CM; Dammhahn M; Eccard JA
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Jul; 13(7):e10330. PubMed ID: 37520778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Top-down effects of foraging decisions on local, landscape and regional biodiversity of resources (DivGUD).
    Eccard JA; Mendes Ferreira C; Peredo Arce A; Dammhahn M
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Jan; 25(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 34713543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk.
    Eccard JA; Liesenjohann T; Dammhahn M
    Oecologia; 2020 Dec; 194(4):621-634. PubMed ID: 33141325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size dependency of patch departure behavior: evidence from granivorous rodents.
    Cozzoli F; Gjoni V; Basset A
    Ecology; 2019 Oct; 100(10):e02800. PubMed ID: 31233618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct and cascading effects of landscape structure on tropical forest and non-forest frugivorous birds.
    Morante-Filho JC; Arroyo-Rodríguez V; Pessoa MS; Cazetta E; Faria D
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Dec; 28(8):2024-2032. PubMed ID: 30277623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of predation risk and missed opportunity costs for context-dependent foraging patterns.
    Eccard JA; Liesenjohann T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94107. PubMed ID: 24809666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Harvester ant response to spatial and temporal heterogeneity in seed availability: pattern in the process of granivory.
    Wilby A; Shachak M
    Oecologia; 2000 Dec; 125(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 28547219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Look before you leap: is risk of injury a foraging cost?
    Berger-Tal O; Mukherjee S; Kotler BP; Brown JS
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2009 Oct; 63(12):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 19779627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Foraging in groups affects giving-up densities: solo foragers quit sooner.
    Carthey AJ; Banks PB
    Oecologia; 2015 Jul; 178(3):707-13. PubMed ID: 25740332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food.
    Charalabidis A; Dechaume-Moncharmont FX; Petit S; Bohan DA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187167. PubMed ID: 29121652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harvester ants use interactions to regulate forager activation and availability.
    Pinter-Wollman N; Bala A; Merrell A; Queirolo J; Stumpe MC; Holmes S; Gordon DM
    Anim Behav; 2013 Jul; 86(1):197-207. PubMed ID: 24031094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Population and community consequences of spatial subsidies derived from central-place foraging.
    Fagan WF; Lutscher F; Schneider K
    Am Nat; 2007 Dec; 170(6):902-15. PubMed ID: 18171172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do birds see the forest for the trees? Scale-dependent effects of tree diversity on avian predation of artificial larvae.
    Muiruri EW; Rainio K; Koricheva J
    Oecologia; 2016 Mar; 180(3):619-30. PubMed ID: 26201260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foraging patterns of voles at heterogeneous avian and uniform mustelid predation risk.
    Eccard JA; Pusenius J; Sundell J; Halle S; Ylönen H
    Oecologia; 2008 Oct; 157(4):725-34. PubMed ID: 18648858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring.
    Behney AC; O'Shaughnessy R; Eichholz MW; Stafford JD
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Jan; 8(2):961-972. PubMed ID: 29375770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The richness of small pockets: Decapod species peak in small seagrass patches where fish predators are absent.
    Boada J; Pagès JF; Gera A; Macpherson E; Santana Y; Romero J; Alcoverro T
    Mar Environ Res; 2018 Nov; 142():1-6. PubMed ID: 30253917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linking foraging decisions to residential yard bird composition.
    Lerman SB; Warren PS; Gan H; Shochat E
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43497. PubMed ID: 22927974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using spatially explicit models to characterize foraging performance in heterogeneous landscapes.
    Grünbaum D
    Am Nat; 1998 Feb; 151(2):97-113. PubMed ID: 18811411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral "bycatch" from camera trap surveys yields insights on prey responses to human-mediated predation risk.
    Burton AC; Beirne C; Sun C; Granados A; Procko M; Chen C; Fennell M; Constantinou A; Colton C; Tjaden-McClement K; Fisher JT; Burgar J
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Jul; 12(7):e9108. PubMed ID: 35866017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.