182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36416662)
1. Simulated workplace protection factor study of a quarter-facepiece elastomeric respirator.
Sietsema M; Hamza H; Brosseau LM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2023 Jan; 20(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 36416662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Respirator Performance against Nanoparticles under Simulated Workplace Activities.
Vo E; Zhuang Z; Horvatin M; Liu Y; He X; Rengasamy S
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Oct; 59(8):1012-21. PubMed ID: 26180261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Simulated Workplace Protection Factors Offered by N95 and P100 Filtering Facepiece and Elastomeric Half-Mask Respirators against Particles of 10 to 400 nm.
He X; Vo E; Horvatin M; Liu Y; Bergman M; Zhuang Z
J Nanotechnol Mater Sci; 2015 Sep; 2(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 26273701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fit evaluation of NIOSH approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators with various skin protectants: A pilot study.
Bergman MS; Grinshpun SA; Yermakov MV; Zhuang Z; Vollmer BE; Yoon KN
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2023 Sep; 20(9):365-372. PubMed ID: 37319423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are quantitative fit factors predictive of respirator fit during simulated healthcare activities?
Sietsema M; Brosseau LM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Dec; 15(12):803-809. PubMed ID: 30142034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of subject characteristics and respirator features on respirator fit.
Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Ann RB
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Dec; 2(12):641-9. PubMed ID: 16298949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of respirator fit capability test criteria for full-facepiece air-purifying respirators.
Bergman MS; Zhuang Z; Xu SS; Rengasamy S; Lawrence RB; Boutin B; Harris JR
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Jul; 16(7):489-497. PubMed ID: 31107187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect on Fit of Multiple Consecutive Donning and Doffing of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
Vuma CD; Manganyi J; Wilson K; Rees D
Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Oct; 63(8):930-936. PubMed ID: 31504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Errors associated with three methods of assessing respirator fit.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Duling MG; Campbell DL
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Jan; 3(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 16485349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of total inward leakage for NIOSH-approved elastomeric half-facepiece, full-facepiece, and powered air-purifying respirators using sodium chloride and corn oil aerosols.
Rengasamy S; Zhuang Z; Lawrence RB; Boutin B; Yorio P; Horvatin M; McClain C; Harris JR; Coffey C
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2021 Jul; 18(7):305-313. PubMed ID: 34038318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between respirator fit and respirator fit test panel cells by respirator size.
Zhuang Z; Groce D; Ahlers HW; Iskander W; Landsittel D; Guffey S; Benson S; Viscusi D; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Oct; 5(10):617-28. PubMed ID: 18666022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Facepiece Respirators and Surgical Masks Against Surgical Smoke: Simulated Workplace Protection Factor Study.
Gao S; Koehler RH; Yermakov M; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jun; 60(5):608-18. PubMed ID: 26929204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Under-mask beard covers achieve an adequate seal with tight-fitting disposable respirators using quantitative fit testing.
Bhatia DDS; Bhatia KS; Saluja T; Saluja APS; Thind A; Bamra A; Singh G; Singh N; Clezy K; Dempsey K; Hudson B; Jain S
J Hosp Infect; 2022 Oct; 128():8-12. PubMed ID: 35662553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total outward leakage of half-mask respirators and surgical masks used for source control.
Myers WR; Yang W; Ryan KJ; Bergman MS; M Fisher E; Soo JC; Zhuang Z
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2023 Dec; 20(12):610-620. PubMed ID: 37682702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators--a comparison study.
Rengasamy S; Walbert GF; Newcomb WE; Faulkner K; Rengasamy MM; Brannen JJ; Szalajda JV
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):206-16. PubMed ID: 24107745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
