133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36416687)
21. The Impact Oncoplastic Reduction Has on Long-Term Recurrence in Breast Conservation Therapy.
Losken A; Smearman EL; Hart AM; Broecker JS; Carlson GW; Styblo TM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 May; 149(5):867e-875e. PubMed ID: 35255055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The use of reduction mammaplasty with breast conservation therapy: an analysis of timing and outcomes.
Egro FM; Pinell-White X; Hart AM; Losken A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jun; 135(6):963e-971e. PubMed ID: 26017612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique.
Losken A; Dugal CS; Styblo TM; Carlson GW
Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Feb; 72(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 23503430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Time to Radiation after Oncoplastic Reduction versus After Lumpectomy.
Marxen T; Chan P; Baker N; Godette KD; Styblo TM; Carlson GW; Losken A
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2023 May; 11(5):e4970. PubMed ID: 37180986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Trends in Lumpectomy and Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in the US, 2011-2016.
Kimball CC; Nichols CI; Vose JG; Peled AW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 25(13):3867-3873. PubMed ID: 30242775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bilateral Free Flap Breast Reconstruction After Unilateral Radiation: Comparing Intraoperative Vascular Complications and Postoperative Outcomes in Radiated Versus Nonradiated Breasts.
Fracol ME; Basta MN; Nelson JA; Fischer JP; Wu LC; Serletti JM; Fosnot J
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Mar; 76(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 26545214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparing Outcomes after Oncoplastic Breast Reduction and Breast Reduction for Benign Macromastia.
Marano AA; Grover K; Peysakhovich A; Lin AJ; Castillo W; Rohde CH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 149(3):541-548. PubMed ID: 35006098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Simultaneous Symmetry Procedure in Patients Undergoing Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery: An Evaluation of Patient Desire and Revision Rates.
Millen JC; Jackson KM; Stern SL; Orozco JIJ; Fancher CE; Grumley J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 30(10):6135-6139. PubMed ID: 37537484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The no-vertical scar technique for oncoplastic breast reconstruction.
Venardi A; Newsom KD; DeBrock W; Pittelkow E; Lester M; Fisher CS; Ludwig KK; Hadad I; Hassanein AH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Jan; 76():136-141. PubMed ID: 36516504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The use of oncoplastic reduction techniques to reconstruct partial mastectomy defects in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Song HM; Styblo TM; Carlson GW; Losken A
Breast J; 2010; 16(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 20102367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation for patients who need mastectomy.
Silverstein MJ; Savalia N; Khan S; Ryan J
Breast J; 2015; 21(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 25583035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Lumpectomy vs oncoplastic surgery for breast-conserving therapy of cancer. A prospective study about 99 patients].
Giacalone PL; Roger P; Dubon O; El Gareh N; Daurés JP; Laffargue F
Ann Chir; 2006 Apr; 131(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 16530156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. "Systematic review and meta-analysis of immediate versus delayed autologous breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy adjuvant radiation therapy".
Hershenhouse KS; Bick K; Shauly O; Kondra K; Ye J; Gould DJ; Patel KM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 May; 74(5):931-944. PubMed ID: 33423976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Secondary Surgeries After Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty.
Brown CA; Mercury OA; Hart AM; Carlson GW; Losken A
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 87(6):628-632. PubMed ID: 34176899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Margin Proximity Correlates with Local Recurrence After Mastectomy for Patients Not Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy.
Glorioso JM; Gonzalez Juarrero AB; Rodysill BR; Harmsen WS; Habermann EB; Carter JM; Mutter RW; Degnim AC; Jakub JW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 24(11):3148-3156. PubMed ID: 28681156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Mammographic Findings Following Oncoplastic Mammoplasty and Lumpectomy Without Reconstruction.
Piper M; Peled AW; Sbitany H; Foster RD; Esserman LJ; Price ER
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 25994209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation.
Smitt MC; Nowels KW; Zdeblick MJ; Jeffrey S; Carlson RW; Stockdale FE; Goffinet DR
Cancer; 1995 Jul; 76(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 8625101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A head-to-head comparison of quality of life and aesthetic outcomes following immediate, staged-immediate, and delayed oncoplastic reduction mammaplasty.
Patel KM; Hannan CM; Gatti ME; Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jun; 127(6):2167-2175. PubMed ID: 21617450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of a Retroglandular Oncoplastic Technique as a Standard Level I Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Retrospective Clinicopathologic Study of 102 Patients With Breast Cancer.
Mátrai Z; Újhelyi M; Kovács T; Kelemen P; Sávolt Á; Kovács E; Éles K; Mészáros N; Kenessey I; Stamatiou A; Pukancsik D
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(3):e459-e467. PubMed ID: 30992191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
