258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36416925)
1. Assessing the readability and quality of online information about benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Hotz T; Zhou MT; Reissmann ME; Apoj M; Wason SEL; Wang DS
World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):257-262. PubMed ID: 36416925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the Quality of Online Health Information about Prostate Cancer Treatment.
Lee JG; Reissmann ME; Parkhomenko E; Wang DS
Urol Pract; 2021 May; 8(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 37145667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How Readable Is BPH Treatment Information on the Internet? Assessing Barriers to Literacy in Prostate Health.
Koo K; Yap RL
Am J Mens Health; 2017 Mar; 11(2):300-307. PubMed ID: 27903952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readability Assessment of Internet-based Patient Education Materials Related to Treatment Options for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Sare A; Patel A; Kothari P; Kumar A; Patel N; Shukla PA
Acad Radiol; 2020 Nov; 27(11):1549-1554. PubMed ID: 31926859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.
Raja H; Patel K
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Sep; 105(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 36374281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of the readability and visual appearance of online patient resources for fibroadenoma.
Hutchings HA; Remesh A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277823. PubMed ID: 36399450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.
Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.
Alpaydın MT; Buyuk SK; Canigur Bavbek N
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34269827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
Raja H; Almansoor ZR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Jan; 106(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 36748797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readability and quality of online patient health information on parotidectomy.
Tan JY; Tan YC; Yap D
J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Dec; 137(12):1378-1383. PubMed ID: 37606526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
