160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36416962)
1. Optimization of DNA extraction and sampling methods for successful forensic microbiome analyses of the skin and saliva.
Yu KM; Lee AM; Cho HS; Lee JW; Lim SK
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 36416962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of the performance of five extraction methods: Chelex® 100, QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit, QIAamp® DNA Investigator Kit, QIAsymphony® DNA Investigator® Kit and DNA IQ™.
Ip SC; Lin SW; Lai KM
Sci Justice; 2015 May; 55(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 25934373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applied Biosystems™ PrepFiler™ Forensic DNA Extraction Kit (Manual and Semi-automated via AutoMate Express™).
Foley MM
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():53-81. PubMed ID: 37439975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs.
Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developmental validation of the PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit for extraction of genomic DNA from biological samples.
Brevnov MG; Pawar HS; Mundt J; Calandro LM; Furtado MR; Shewale JG
J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 19302383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Challenges and insights in the exploration of the low abundance human ocular surface microbiome.
Herzog EL; Kreuzer M; Zinkernagel MS; Zysset-Burri DC
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2023; 13():1232147. PubMed ID: 37727808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.
Sherier AJ; Kieser RE; Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; King JL; Woerner AE; Ambers A; Garofano P; Budowle B
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 31165261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collection techniques of touch DNA deposited on human skin following a strangulation scenario.
Alketbi SK
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Sep; 137(5):1347-1352. PubMed ID: 37278841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies.
Lim MY; Park YS; Kim JH; Nam YD
BMC Microbiol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):212. PubMed ID: 32680572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of NucleoSpin® Forensic Filters on DNA recovery from trace DNA swabs.
Heathfield LJ; Hitewa AN; Gibbon A; Mole CG
Sci Justice; 2022 May; 62(3):284-287. PubMed ID: 35598922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms.
Wise NM; Wagner SJ; Worst TJ; Sprague JE; Oechsle CM
Microbiologyopen; 2021 Nov; 10(6):e1244. PubMed ID: 34964289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories.
Jäger AC; Alvarez ML; Davis CP; Guzmán E; Han Y; Way L; Walichiewicz P; Silva D; Pham N; Caves G; Bruand J; Schlesinger F; Pond SJK; Varlaro J; Stephens KM; Holt CL
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():52-70. PubMed ID: 28171784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Influence of DNA Extraction and Lipid Removal on Human Milk Bacterial Profiles.
Ojo-Okunola A; Claassen-Weitz S; Mwaikono KS; Gardner-Lubbe S; Zar HJ; Nicol MP; du Toit E
Methods Protoc; 2020 May; 3(2):. PubMed ID: 32429170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Maximum DNA Yield from a New Noninvasive Buccal Collection Device Following Various Extraction Protocols.
Pißarreck M; Moreira F; Foley M
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2021 May; 25(5):376-380. PubMed ID: 33926219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
