BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36417036)

  • 1. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
    Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
    Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
    Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
    J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Circular Stapled Technique Versus Modified Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Higaki E; Fujieda H; Nagao T; Ito S; Komori K; Iwase M; Oze I; Shimizu Y
    Ann Surg; 2022 Jul; 276(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34417369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
    World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Kamarajah SK; Bundred JR; Singh P; Pasquali S; Griffiths EA
    BJS Open; 2020 Aug; 4(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 32445431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Hayata K; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Ojima T; Iwahashi M; Katsuda M; Tsuji T; Kato T; Kitadani J; Takeuchi A; Tabata H; Yamaue H
    Surgery; 2017 Jul; 162(1):131-138. PubMed ID: 28318550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Schlottmann F; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Jun; 32(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 35583556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of a Long Linear Staplers on the Incidence of Stricture after Triangulating Esophagogastric Anastomosis.
    Toyota S; Kimura Y; Jogo T; Hu Q; Hokonohara K; Nakanishi R; Hisamatsu Y; Ando K; Oki E; Mori M
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2021 Jan; 31(4):453-456. PubMed ID: 33492082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Totally Mechanical Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Stricture Formation Compared with Circular Stapled Anastomosis.
    Hirano Y; Fujita T; Sato K; Kurita D; Sato T; Ishiyama K; Fujiwara H; Oguma J; Daiko H
    World J Surg; 2020 Dec; 44(12):4175-4183. PubMed ID: 32783124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk Factors of Anastomosis Stricture After Esophagectomy and the Impact of Anastomosis Technique.
    Na B; Kang CH; Na KJ; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 May; 115(5):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 36739069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Liu H; Shan L; Wang J; Zhai R; Zhu Y; Yao F
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):891-901. PubMed ID: 36038647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.